First of all i protested all those wars. But what you do is trying to push the conversation out of context, often called as "whataboutism". It's good that you deleted Afghanstan this time since it could be interpreted as USSR invasion as well. So more or less we can say that i am agains all kinds of invasions, you are pro invasion, and see Russia's intensions legitimate, because somebody else is also doing it.
"I told you - politicians have to talk. But we are talking instead. And it's not so good." This sentence is a fundamental indicator of being against public opinion and free speech. Look what totalitarian thinking made you. Let me tell what Russia is intending with these wars. Expanding... This only justifies and proves NATO. If Russia could mind its own business and prosper, NATO would be redundant. But no, you must take some Ukrainian land, and then some more, and then maybe some more from Baltics?
Very few map changes turned out well after WWII, and it's quite interesting that still there are countries trying to expand unpeacefully, neglecting the fact that today competition is in other fields where peaceful competition is possible.