LGBTQ+

  • 789
  • 33
  • 98

But according to the Bible the childreen of Adam and Eve were paired with each other so we come from incest and that is a sin, as you say we are ALL sinners, "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone" said Jesus Christ.

I'm genderfluid and omni, and I'm proud to be part of the lgbt+ community.
I think people should accept different opinions from theirs and respect those who have different ideas.
Why is being gay or lesbian so "weird" or "disgusting" or "unacceptable" for homophobes?
I mean, everyone has the right to be whoever they want to be.
Why can you decide to be atheist, but not gay? Is there any difference? No, it's just something personal, it's your choice, your private life.
I can't choose who to love. I fall in love, and that's it.
I really don't understand those who say: "Being gay is wrong. God will punish you" or something like that. If God really hated lgbt people and didn't want them to.. "happen" let's say so, or to be lgbt, then he wouldn't have created them. Right?
If he has control on everything, he could have just made all of us straight. But he didn't, so he accepts lgbt people.
Why do we have to be considered different? This is nonsense.
And why is someone who doesn't feel comfortable in their body ridiculous? It's not their fault if they're born in the wrong body and now want to change it, or identify differently. I can't choose my body at birth, but I can decide to be who I want to be during my life.

The rainbow flag has only 6 colours - in contrast to the natural rainbow with 7 colours. In the Holy Scriptures, the rainbow is the sign of God's covenant with His people. A sign of faithfulness to His commandments.
The rainbow flag is a revolutionary sign. The LGTB rebels against the divine order.
One colour is missing: sky blue. The colour of Mary, which also symbolises purity.
Just a coincidence?

Oh c'mon
If God didn't accept lgbt people he wouldn't have let them happen. He would have just said "No" , and wouldn't have created them.
Obviously God loves everyone, as you all always say. Lgbt is a part of everyone.

Why can you decide to be atheist, but not gay? Is there any difference?
Because the first is a choice you can make after thinking about the existence of God while the second is a natural condition which is determined at least partly by your genes. It's like saying "why can't you choose to be naturally blond or have blue eyes", well, you can't. You can pretend to be what you aren't, but you inevitably have brown hairs.
You even say it yourself: you can't choose who to love.

Adam and Eve were perfect and had the explicit mandate to fill the earth with descendants. Their children would also have been perfect - also perfectly healthy. Because of their rebellion against God, Adam and Eve lost their perfection, yet their children could still safely intermarry.
This was only forbidden a a long time after. (see Genesis 18:6-17).

On the second point: "Jesus said let him who is without sin cast the first stone." I do not condemn a single person. - But let us also look at what Jesus says in the following: "Sin no more from now on."
-> We must not declare sin to be a "right".
->A person often cannot help his homosexual inclination. A person with homosexual inclination can even become a saint. Not the inclination is a sin, only homosexual practices (by the way, they would also be in a heterosexual marriage).
-> God is not unjust. There is not a single perfect human being. Everyone carries inclinations within themselves with which they have to struggle. That comes from original sin.

If you are so convinced, you should dedicate yourself to being a missionary instead of wasting time here, right?

Yes, I was catholic before and I know that the most important virtue is charity, more than faith 😉 so being a good person should be what matters

Comparing homosexality with paedophily is quite a problem. Children can't consent but to homosexuals are. And maybe we should open a topic about problems in the Catholic institution one day.

Comparing homosexality with paedophily is quite a problem. Children can't consent but to homosexuals are. And maybe we should open a topic about problems in the Catholic institution one day.
Exactly

Well, I'm part of LGBT community. I'm female trans. It's not easy to come out. Believe me, I know.

Why can you decide to be atheist, but not gay? Is there any difference?
Because the first is a choice you can make after thinking about the existence of God while the second is a natural condition which is determined at least partly by your genes. It's like saying "why can't you choose to be naturally blond or have blue eyes", well, you can't. You can pretend to be what you aren't, but you inevitably have brown hairs.
You even say it yourself: you can't choose who to love.


I didn't understand what you wanted ti say.
I meant love isn't a choice. So why do people hate LGBT+ when they did nothing wrong?
That wasn't a serious question, just ironic one.
There obviously isn't any difference because they both are your choice and pieple should respect them

syx syx

.Love is not hindered by gender.

I feel like gender identity is an important thing, everyone should just be themselves

i am part of the communti. I don't want to be treated differently. Of course it hurts to hear that we are sick in some eyes. My moto is live and let live.

The suicide rate for trans people is almost 50%. I just find it sad that the state prevents you from being the way you want to be. You don't hurt anyone with it.

syx syx

I don't agree with homosexuality, but I don't object. But in the eyes of the Chinese, they are strongly opposed. Because they believe that only a normal family is the best destination. But I've seen gay lovers . They don't have psychological problems.

I find it odd, that so many people seem to make their sexuality an enormous part of their personality and are proud of it.

I have seen a (very bad) "documentary" where a woman said she would adjust to the prejudices people have about lesbians in order to be seen as a lesbian. That is very ridiculous in my opinion.
The LGTBQ+ people you see on the internet are very often convinced that they are special and must be treated special.

There is obviously nothing wrong with being yourself and noone should have to hide because of who they love or how they are.

But especially this "pride" thing is just weird. When one is proud of something it should be because one achieved something, made something, just DID something. Why would you be proud to be gay? You didn't do anything to be gay. It has nothing to do with what you have done in your life.

As you can see my view on the LGTBQ+ community is a little negative.

pride isn't really a proudness of the act of being gay itself, but pride of belonging to a community that is marginalized and working to slowly overcoming that. People aren't simply proud of their sexuality, its about overcoming the shame people are made to feel for simply being themselves.

The liberation of the oppressed LGBTQ+ people is also part of the communist movement

Let's look back at some often-overlooked history. In the LGBTQ+ liberation movement in history, Marxism has always been behind. New laws made after the Russian revolution abolished sodomy and even allowed individuals to register their gender at will (so Soviet Russia was actually the first country to decriminalize homosexual behavior!) These progressive policies were outlawed after the 1930s, as a result of the deterioration of the Bolshevik Party.
The rise of LGBTQ+ liberation in America as a political issue (and not just "getting along") can be attributed to The Mattachine, a group founded by a few Communist Party members. It was the first LGBTQ+ liberation movement in American history to have political influence.

Ten temat był przez jakiś czas nieaktywny i jest teraz tylko do odczytu.