Remember, you said - taking Donbass by Russia would be some kind of NAZI tactic?
Never said that, You are making up things now.
OK, but what was Jugoslavia, Iraq, Libia, Syria? Wasn't it also NAZI tactic? So, we can say that it's so many countries who using NAZI tactic?
No.
Another thing, can you explaine to me why the USA troops are still in Syria? Does it complys with any international law?
As far as I know, russian troops also still are in Syria.
I don't know what you are trying to express through your posts, but that has nothing to do with what I was saying. Telling "West bad" doesn't mean that Russia is much better, y'know, and yelling nazi all the time make the word losing all its meaning.
And, Lianshen, briefly about your point about casus belli. There are many evidance about NAZY and their tactic in Ukraine. There are nor NAZY on the territiries "occupied" by Russians. Denazification is going on.
Yes, admitting this is true (which is probably not); is it the real reason behind annexation of Donbass? Like you said, even you don't believe it, so why do you try to push this story so much?
I don't know why Ukraine did not declaire war to Russia? But everybody calls it a war!
Maybe because they couldn't and are now fighting Russia not with their own forces, but witht he western block supporting them? Because fights have been initiated by Russia? If Russia refuse to call a cat a cat, it doesn't suddenly become a dog.
You criticize Billa,but you are not so far from him in the end. You answer to people without responding to them, but you talk alone, you double post, you get into offtopic... This thread was disappointing from the begining, but the more it goes, the more everybody gets dogmatic here.