-You are prolonging unnecessary sentences. Slobodan Milošević is a genocidal murderer and any attack on yugoslava under his government is legitimate. Congratulations once again to the pilots who participated in the bombing.
What does that even mean? Because "HE BAD", then it makes NATO intervention less illegal, unjustified and manipulation of western citizen in order to do so more acceptable at any point?
-You must be either very stupid or malicious to make this sentence. Look at the distance between Turkey and the Baltics. militarily. Such an attack is not possible and there is no reason for turkey (you are giving a troll answer anyway). In addition, all of the former Soviet countries that wanted to develop a policy independent from Russia were occupied. Russia is occupying the former Soviet geographies that it cannot control. You know, Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia were occupied.
My bad, dunno why I thought about Balkans. Still, the question remain, and still is applicable to Turkey in the Balkans as well since I see nothing that "nostalgia" in your answer.
-you're being silly yes france is a dictatorship and china is a perfect democracy with north korea lol. you are the devil's advocate
Talking about me and what you extrapolate from my posts isn't an argument at all. It rather shows a lack of ability to answer...
-You lie , le pen and zemmour far right, you can't soften them .
Again, a claim isn't an argument. You're free to believe any medias that say "ooh, look at them, bad" or to check their program yourself and compare them to other politicians, but if you'd still call them far right after reading or listening to them, then I'm afraid Macron at least is also the far right (just for France).
-another ignorant comment ..parties are based on ideologies and ideologies do not die
You talk about a government, and now you come to me with party and then ideology like if they were the same. No, a government and a party isn't the same, and parties can die even if they are based on so called "eternal" ideologies. So far, I don't see many monarchists, nor bonapartists in France. Bonaparte might be a good example, too, that a government follow its leader. De Gaulle as well (and his party will vanish soon afrter being highly deflected).
-what purpose did it serve lol. cannot serve anything.
To show the ridiculous of the sentence you wrote., as mentionned here:
This is as ridiculous, to me, as implying that Turkish are cockroaches with the picture I sent. Hence, it was only a mockery.
it's tiring to answer more of this nonsense
What's the purpose of exposing your feelings here? This is, yet again, not an argument of any sort. Please, do make an effort if you wish to answer.
-Germany's population is 80 million and its democracy is solid. after the gorgeous north korea of course 🙂
I don't know German politics enough. However, I'd argue that a country being part of EU and praised by EU as well as having a greater poverty (at least a few years ago) than France with a disastrous working system favourising precarious jobs is a doubtious democracy. You might see it differently though, or try another country after Sweden and Switzerland if you wish so, dunno, might find one someday.