Russia in Peace Politics and governments

I don’t know what said exactly the Minsk protocol but as I know, that never worked. It is very likely that the next agreements will be more observed when each camp will have understood the absurdity of an armed conflict. May be the actual war will be a lesson for everybody.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-vladimir-putin-invokes-nazis-113309588.html

I don’t know what said exactly the Minsk protocol but as I know, that never worked. It is very likely that the next agreements will be more observed when each camp will have understood the absurdity of an armed conflict. May be the actual war will be a lesson for everybody.

The conflict is the latest way to change Ukraine constitution due Minsk Protocol. So nobody read? All believe to News? One page to read only.

I don’t know what said exactly the Minsk protocol but as I know, that never worked. It is very likely that the next agreements will be more observed when each camp will have understood the absurdity of an armed conflict. May be the actual war will be a lesson for everybody.

It's sad to not read it since it's one of the root of the current conflict... It includes ceasefire, removing foreign forces and some near impossible measures like having a local self government in the eastern regions. If not all, most of the points have been violated and or never have been done by both Ukraine and pro-russians territories.

I don’t know what said exactly the Minsk protocol but as I know, that never worked. It is very likely that the next agreements will be more observed when each camp will have understood the absurdity of an armed conflict. May be the actual war will be a lesson for everybody.

It's sad to not read it since it's one of the root of the current conflict... It includes ceasefire, removing foreign forces and some near impossible measures like having a local self government in the eastern regions. If not all, most of the points have been violated and or never have been done by both Ukraine and pro-russians territories.

Look-like the conflict is a way to Ukraine constitution reforms (.

Tromoz, do you think that Ukrainian constitution had to be reformed and do you think that war a good way to reform Ukrainian constitution? Don't you think that Russian constitution must be reformed too?

Tromoz, do you think that Ukrainian constitution had to be reformed and do you think that war a good way to reform Ukrainian constitution? Don't you think that Russian constitution must be reformed too?

The Minsk Protocol means reformation Ukraine constitution. Macrone ask Russia government to perform The Minsk protocol. 8 eyars was talking about. I don't know another way to change constitution in another country, do you?
P.S. I agree that Russian constitution must be reformed too.

I don't see the interest to speak about an old accord never respected. The first concern now should be to put an end to these massacres and these destructions. The first reform for Russian constitution should be to prevent the same person from staying too long in power.

I don't see the interest to speak about an old accord never respected. The first concern now should be to put an end to these massacres and these destructions. The first reform for Russian constitution should be to prevent the same person from staying too long in power.

Even elected by vote?
What about Great Britian?
Or it is only for Russia?
Or you mean that citizens never choose leader. Do you think President have all power? German president didn't.

I don't see the interest to speak about an old accord never respected. The first concern now should be to put an end to these massacres and these destructions. The first reform for Russian constitution should be to prevent the same person from staying too long in power.

I don't see any interest in talking about the bread I left on the table last evening. What interest me is why I have no edible baguette for my breakfast.

That's what you are saying here.

What is the problem with having the same person in power for a long period of time? As far as I know, France change its government up to every 5 (7 in the past) years, yet I see the same faces there for as long as I can remember. Worse, it's been 4-50 years that it's more or less ruled shittily by the same people. I'd rather keep a decent president if I could, more than 5-10 years.
French people are funny with their view on democracy and how it is bad to do this or that - especially to tell it to other countries- while being absolute clowns... Aren't we going to elect the same dude who spend his time cosplaying for 5 more years while Putin is being a "very bad, stupid, mean bully" over there? Sure we are.

Even if in France some politicians could have a long career in politics that doesn’t mean they have the power all along the time. In Russia the same man has been imposing his absolute power for more than twenty years and is driving his country and the World towards catastrophe. In Russia any checks and balances or alternation are impossible and cannot prevent the abominable excesses of a criminal who has become president and seems now losing his mind. I think the actualities show that clearly. Don’t search to find a reason in an old paper. The first problem is Putin.
Of course you have the liberty in France to find Putin as a wonderful president and think we need the same in France but I’m not very original and continue to think it’s very bad to slaughter innocent people.

Even if in France some politicians could have a long career in politics that doesn’t mean they have the power all along the time. In Russia the same man

You missed the point. This is not what I was talking about... Neither did you provide any answer to my questions.

Putin is more or less a dictator who has public support and does not do any harm or imposes restrictions on his citizens unlike Xi jimping and Kim Jong un

Are you from our country? What qualifications do you have to say about our country? Yes, India does have contradictions with China. Don't you think your country has made mistakes? Our life is a hundred times better than yours. Our women are also more powerful than you. Is this the great India created by more than a dozen democratic parties? Why do you believe your media's boring propaganda? Do you drink too much dirty Ganges river? I tell you, Indian child,our country also has democratic parties. Our ethnic minorities are not restricted. Your news is all rumors! Look at the conscience of India - what kind of country is India photographed by Mr. Amir Khan! Don't take pride in being an Indian man. You are so ignorant. Welcome to China, but we will never pay you

Putin is more or less a dictator who has public support and does not do any harm or imposes restrictions on his citizens unlike Xi jimping and Kim Jong un

Putin is more or less a dictator who has public support and does not do any harm or imposes restrictions on his citizens unlike Xi jimping and Kim Jong un

You need to do more reading about Putin's treatment of opposition candidates, their lawyers and families and of some opposition journalists as well. A few years back there were a series of curious "accidents" where people wishing to reduce Putin's power or to replace him with someone else fell out of windows to their deaths or serious injury.

Putin is more or less a dictator who has public support and does not do any harm or imposes restrictions on his citizens unlike Xi jimping and Kim Jong un

You need to do more reading about Putin's treatment of opposition candidates, their lawyers and families and of some opposition journalists as well. A few years back there were a series of curious "accidents" where people wishing to reduce Putin's power or to replace him with someone else fell out of windows to their deaths or serious injury.

Americans are really good at making up facts. Americans fabricate a series of facts based on what happened in their own country to slander countries in conflict with the United States. I think the American news media should win the Pulitzer Prize

Putin is more or less a dictator who has public support and does not do any harm or imposes restrictions on his citizens unlike Xi jimping and Kim Jong un

You need to do more reading about Putin's treatment of opposition candidates, their lawyers and families and of some opposition journalists as well. A few years back there were a series of curious "accidents" where people wishing to reduce Putin's power or to replace him with someone else fell out of windows to their deaths or serious injury.

Americans are really good at making up facts. Americans fabricate a series of facts based on what happened in their own country to slander countries in conflict with the United States. I think the American news media should win the Pulitzer Prize

It's easy to make broad sweeping statements without any substance about other countries without any concrete examples to back them up.

I'd be willing to post links to news reports which back up what I've shared, but it's very likely that your country has blocked your access to them.

I don't disagree that there are some things that the US has made up, but these reports are not just from US media, the are from sources around the world. So if you have any credible new links that dispute what I've shared please put them here. Otherwise please keep your generalities to yourself.

Please also note that the US media doesn't just publish articles that cast a negative light on countries we're in conflict with. They also publish articles that are unfavorable to our allies when they think that our citizens should know such things.

Putin is more or less a dictator who has public support and does not do any harm or imposes restrictions on his citizens unlike Xi jimping and Kim Jong un

You need to do more reading about Putin's treatment of opposition candidates, their lawyers and families and of some opposition journalists as well. A few years back there were a series of curious "accidents" where people wishing to reduce Putin's power or to replace him with someone else fell out of windows to their deaths or serious injury.

Americans are really good at making up facts. Americans fabricate a series of facts based on what happened in their own country to slander countries in conflict with the United States. I think the American news media should win the Pulitzer Prize

It's easy to make broad sweeping statements without any substance about other countries without any concrete examples to back them up.

I'd be willing to post links to news reports which back up what I've shared, but it's very likely that your country has blocked your access to them.

I don't disagree that there are some things that the US has made up, but these reports are not just from US media, the are from sources around the world. So if you have any credible new links that dispute what I've shared please put them here. Otherwise please keep your generalities to yourself.

Please also note that the US media doesn't just publish articles that cast a negative light on countries we're in conflict with. They also publish articles that are unfavorable to our allies when they think that our citizens should know such things.

To tell you the truth, sir, I envy your democracy very much. You can march on the streets, express different views, and make fun of your president with a talk show. But there is one question - have all your problems been solved? People just have the right to know the so-called truth and have the right to March, but there are many problems in your country that have not been solved. In addition, world peace will never be maintained by Americans