Yes you're right. But I'm confident that in the future we'll have electric powered cargo ships, hopefully it won't be too late!
Maybe from solar but I would guess mostly thanks to next gen batteries?
We talked in our society class about environment problems. And we talked about earth warmth pomps (I have no idea how to call that in English) and solar plates to warm your house. And the teacher said that for solar plates the problem is that you have to keep the electricity for longer times and you need VERY strong batteries but there are things in batteries that will be more difficult to get in the future. Like some chemicals maybe and it was i think litium or something like that but i have to look it up again! 😛
Today I made a statement with @Esma-Nur together and we think it is VERY IMPORTANT!!! So if you have a baby you must pay very good attention!! 😛
➡️ Babies and very small children should not watch tv or maximum 30 minutes per day!! And ipads and iphones should not be allowed at all because they bring it too close to their eyes!!!
We saw this both (Esma-Nur with her niece and nephew and they can use an ipad and Yue with babysitting that he can watch youtube or videoland what his parents choose) and it was too close for their eyes and too long so they become lazy and dont play in normal way anymore!!!
What do you think about this statement? True ✅ or false ❌ ?
Today I made a statement with @Esma-Nur together and we think it is VERY IMPORTANT!!! So if you have a baby you must pay very good attention!! 😛BAbies can be really problematic and hard BUT the problem is they can get addicted and they wil get wild if u give them a phone or a tablet or turn on the TV and doesnt par attention to them + at the and they will use u and tell YOU what to do (when my nice was 1 yro she was acactly this kind of child/baby)
➡️ Babies should not watch tv or maximum 30 minutes per day!! And ipads and iphones should not be allowed at all because they bring it too close to their eyes!!!
We saw this both (Esma-Nur with her niece and nephew and they can use an ipad and Yue with babysitting that he can watch youtube or videoland what his parents choose) and it was too close for their eyes and too long so they become lazy and dont play in normal way anymore!!!What do you think about this statement? True ✅ or false ❌ ?
I think that is all true BUTTT with the family i babysit on saturday morning it is the parents too who are maybe more the problem because they think it is ok. And if it is short for maybe like 20 or 30 minutes the whole day that is perhaps ok. But they dont mind if it is longer.
And when I try to play normal games or that he can try to learn to walk he doesnt want that. 🙁
We talked in our society class about environment problems. And we talked about earth warmth pomps (I have no idea how to call that in English) and solar plates to warm your house. And the teacher said that for solar plates the problem is that you have to keep the electricity for longer times and you need VERY strong batteries but there are things in batteries that will be more difficult to get in the future. Like some chemicals maybe and it was i think litium or something like that but i have to look it up again! 😛
Yes it's technically right, but the way to go isn't to store energy it's to push it back to the grid 😄
As for the screen time, no screens at all for babies! Engineers in the Silicon Valley have applied this rule with their own children for many year
I would like to say a few words about wolves. But this applies to all animals in urban environments. Every living creature fulfills a function in the cycle of life (except humans, who are not even good as food). Wolves are no exception.
The question is: who invades which habitat? In most cases, humans are the intruders. By sealing the ground, they are encroaching incredibly deeply on the habitats of countless plants and animals. This has an impact because the natural balance is disturbed.
Yes it's technically right, but the way to go isn't to store energy it's to push it back to the grid 😄As for the screen time, no screens at all for babies! Engineers in the Silicon Valley have applied this rule with their own children for many year
What does push back to the grid mean? But do you need for those batteries also the things that are super rare later?
I would like to say a few words about wolves. But this applies to all animals in urban environments. Every living creature fulfills a function in the cycle of life (except humans, who are not even good as food). Wolves are no exception.
The question is: who invades which habitat? In most cases, humans are the intruders. By sealing the ground, they are encroaching incredibly deeply on the habitats of countless plants and animals. This has an impact because the natural balance is disturbed.
Yes I think that is true and it is for all wild animals. In my country there are now more wolves and they do very well. But I dont want to walk in that forest or they think you are like a hamburger with legs! 😦😦😬
For today I have a statement I made myself but I thought about it because of what @mabah and also above @Lianshen wrote. So this is my statement for today:
➡️ There should be more areas that we give back to nature and maybe even areas where people can't go to (except maybe like nature experts). So that animals are not disturbed and there is more nature again in countries that need it.
What do you think about this statement? True ✅ or false ❌ ?
For today I have a statement I made myself but I thought about it because of what @mabah and also above @Lianshen wrote. So this is my statement for today:True thats why when it was corona the nature was so kalm and the animals where free and relaxing there waren't airplanes not much traffic from cars no air pollution it was beautifull thats why this poll is true➡️ There should be more areas that we give back to nature and maybe even areas where people can't go to (except maybe like nature experts). So that animals are not disturbed and there is more nature again in countries that need it.
What do you think about this statement? True ✅ or false ❌ ?
What does push back to the grid mean? But do you need for those batteries also the things that are super rare later?
It means that instead of trying to store the energy you generate so you can use it later (which is very costly and doesn't work very well), you send that extra energy to the electric network for other people who need it right now. These other people will also, at some point, generate extra energy that you need but are unable to generate at that moment. That way, everyone's happy and you reduce the need for batteries (which yes require rare metals)
➡️ There should be more areas that we give back to nature and maybe even areas where people can't go to (except maybe like nature experts). So that animals are not disturbed and there is more nature again in countries that need it.
There are plenty of areas where nature follows its course, why do you assume there is a shortage of land? Maybe in some specific local areas, but definitely not on the scale of the planet
It means that instead of trying to store the energy you generate so you can use it later (which is very costly and doesn't work very well), you send that extra energy to the electric network for other people who need it right now. These other people will also, at some point, generate extra energy that you need but are unable to generate at that moment. That way, everyone's happy and you reduce the need for batteries (which yes require rare metals)
Thank you @Etienne! Now I understand what you mean with that you bring it back to the grid. So that is the electricity system and others can use it. We spoke about that also in society class BUTTT in our country there is not sufficient system. So like new houses and businesses cant get on it sometimes. That is a problem but they will work on that. 🙂
And thank you @Fleurke and @Etienne for writing about my statement for today! I just made the statement but what i really think myself i will write later because i first like to read what people think! 😛
This time I made a statement with Daymahr ( @-Unknown- ) 🥰:I think it has it's Ups and downs...➡️ If you buy things online from other countries, you should pay a tax for the environment. So that is better for the environment because people buy less or there is money to repair the environment.
What do you think? True ✅ or false ❌ ?
The General is that the Economical System is Rigged... I mean... Status and Financial Divide is clear as Day.. Which Basically to me means there's no "Fair" in any way ofcourse... 👀
But my thoughts on this matter
Basic Standpoint? I would agree and disagree depending what and who ... Especially for those who used the Hidden Inconsistances to maintain to be "Third World Country" to avoid all kinds of Taxes but is also the Main Base for Production...
Especially large Companies as well here are bulk buying the same product here...
For Example... We have Companies like Amazon.nl, Bol.com all these kind of Websites that is a platform for Small and Large Businesses like Aliexpress BUT... They get the Same Product in Bulk Form and Sell it for 3/4 Times the Price which is... Topic of Discussion since People found out they could get it themselves...
For a Site like Aliexpress, Shein and all of these Mass Production (Conditions of these Companies is also up for debat) are mostly the Main Source for Resellers what it all is Basically... But the Country's Origin has had a very Stretched History for Having this Particular Title which is fair Point of Discussion but that these Countries are now no longer "a Third World Country"...
Avoiding these Taxes are Benefitial to Keep Prices Low and ReSellers can have a Higher Profit as well...
You see them on Online Marketplaces and Etsy...
So Yes! For Re-Sellers, Companies and or Regular Consumers as the Factory should have their Share of Taxes...
A lot of People choose Quick Fashion or Other Cheaper Products due to Different Circumstances mainly due to Financial Instability or Lack of Income which is Unstoppeble... But it should not be a Abused for a Higher Costs if this makes sense....
What the Negative Part is from now that Consumer's Side mostly but imo better Enviromental is that People choose the Second Hand Market.. More for the Reasons that for those Who want to keep their money inside of their Country.. They would go to a of cheaper stores that also and probably have connections with "questionable" Suppliers but don't quote me on that... but the Secondhand Market...Which can be also Quite Rigged at this Point... A Old Worn Leather Jacket what you would get for a Small Price 20 years ago has now a Special Title "Vintage"... and a lot of these specific Titles has not only grown with Meaning but also with Inflation which is imo Crazy...This is also a Different topic on it's self... 😅
These are my Impressions, No Facts or Statistics have been used.
Just an overall Opinion from what I see..
It basically has his Ups and Downs.. And it's a System you cannot fight as you still have to Live happily as much as you can!
I think as long you are aware of your needs in life and properly take Care of the Resources and Set Boundaries for this for what's important (No Matter where you get it from).
Then I think you'll have a Good Foundation anyways.. 🤔
Wowww thank you VERY MUCH Daymahr @-Unknown- for your reply to the statement!!! I think I need time to think about it, but i like that. Because i wanted with this forum that everybody can write what they want about a statement each day and we can all learn about it a lot. So this is very good!! 🙂
And what you write can also help with what you said the last!! So that people are aware of what you need and how things work. I am afraid that soon we have maybe not important resources anymore. So I hope that people dont import so much anymore OR that they are more saving what they have. And if they dont need something, dont just throw it away but share with other persons. We do that a lot too and also we get a lot that way (like cool clothes or other things). That is also important I think!