🤷‍♀️🧙‍♂️ True or false? 🙄❓

I don't watch sports so we would end up enduring the same amount of pain 😛

hahah so you mean watching sports is like giving a baby birth or you mean if we both watch sport it hurts the same? 😛

my dad likes car racing A LOTTTT but we tell him that it is NOT A SPORT!!!! they just ride the same rounds in the same car. we dont mean it but we tell him that just to joke. 🙂 and he says that he doesnt understand ballet bc he says that he does not pretend to be a butterfly as a human and that it does not make sense. but he also doesnt mean it i think!! 😝😛😋

Hello everybody! 🙋‍♀️ I have two new statements for today!! 🙂 I am curious what you think of them:

1️⃣ Parents should never hit their children (also not to correct mistakes).

2️⃣ History often repeats itself is NOTTT only a quote but is true.

What do you think of the statements? 🙄🙄 Do you think the statements are true ✅ or false ❌

2️⃣ History often repeats itself is NOTTT only a quote but is true.

It's not the history repeating itself, it's us repeating the same mistakes at dreadful costs. History just keep accounts for the costs humanity has paid in a long span of time.

2️⃣ History often repeats itself is NOTTT only a quote but is true.

It's not the history repeating itself, it's us repeating the same mistakes at dreadful costs. History just keep accounts for the costs humanity has paid in a long span of time.

That is true!!! Sorry i forgot to tag you because i thought that maybe you would like that statement. 🙂

But people also repeat good things that happened in history and not only bad. But often bad things are bigger than the good things (for example wars) so people feel more of it than good things that are repeated. I am not sure if that is true but maybe it is. 🙄🙄

Hello everybody! 🙋‍♀️ We had last week a topic in our society class in school about ALLOWING death. So i decided to copy the statements and ask what you think. In our class some arguments were super tensed of people in my class. So i ask if everybody can respect what other people write even if it is different what maybe you think about it. But you can agree or disagree of course and that is not a problem!! 🙂

These are the two statements:

1️⃣ Abortion should be allowed during pregnancy if the doctors say so.

2️⃣ Euthanesia should be allowed if that is the wish of the person and the doctors agree.

I am curious what you think about the statements!! 🙄🙄 And I am sorry if it is a topic that is super difficult for somebody because i dont want to offend a person or upset anybody.

Do you think the statements are true ✅ or false ❌

PS: I will write later what i think but i first want to read what others think about the statements. Thank you very much!! 🙏🙏

Hello everybody! 🙋‍♀️ We had last week a topic in our society class in school about ALLOWING death. So i decided to copy the statements and ask what you think. In our class some arguments were super tensed of people in my class. So i ask if everybody can respect what other people write even if it is different what maybe you think about it. But you can agree or disagree of course and that is not a problem!! 🙂

These are the two statements:

1️⃣ Abortion should be allowed during pregnancy if the doctors say so.

2️⃣ Euthanesia should be allowed if that is the wish of the person and the doctors agree.

I am curious what you think about the statements!! 🙄🙄 And I am sorry if it is a topic that is super difficult for somebody because i dont want to offend a person or upset anybody.

Do you think the statements are true ✅ or false ❌

PS: I will write later what i think but i first want to read what others think about the statements. Thank you very much!! 🙏🙏

Yes and yes

Yes and yes

I also think that BUTTT only if the doctor says it is still possible. So for example abortion is allowed if it is early but normally not if you are super late in the pregnancy (it is dangerous and also to protect the baby if it can almost be born). ANDDD i think that an abortion CANNOT be against the woman if she decides to keep the baby. So I dont believe in forced abortion. Of course I know the reasons against abortion, but it can also be for example that she got pregnant with a crime and i think if it is early it can be allowed.

For euthanesia i think it should be allowed if there is a doctor who agrees with it. So there must be a good reason like A LOTTT of pain or other things that are really bad. And you cant force a doctor to do euthanesia unless he agrees.

No comment

1️⃣ Abortion should be allowed during pregnancy if the doctors say so.

Up until recently I was in favor of abortion in pretty much all situations. My opinion has shifted for the following reasons.

1) the first argument "my body my choice" is fallacious, as it's not about the mother's body but the baby's body which happens to be inside of the woman:

- You don't abort because you don't want to be pregnant, you abort because you don't want to have to take care of the baby after it's born

- I don't believe a mother should have exclusive ownership over this new person's existence, just like if you have me over at your house you can't do whatever you want with my body, or just like you wouldn't dispose of your own pet.

2) the second argument "you can't kill someone who was never born": there is truth to this, but the main concern behind this is when do we draw the line? We know that a 8 month old fetus is viable and has everything necessary to live a normal life. Is it 4 months? Is it 3 weeks? Is it 7.5 months? If we collectively consider abortion to be morally acceptable, then I think this limit should be very low out of caution.

3) there is something fundamentally morbid about mothers wanting to dispose of their own offspring, this breaks the circle of life with a dark celebration of the end of our own legacy. I know today is all about individual freedom and choices, that everyone is a unique gem in this world and shouldn't bear the burden of responsibility in life because it's an oppressing pattern or whatever, but this seems very short sighted and quite childish to be honest.

4) Limiting babies isn't not just a personal choice without consequences: demography is sharply dropping in developed countries and we are facing very serious problems For instance, the birth rate in South Korea is currently 0.78 and keeps on dropping. In just 3 generations, we can expect the population to decline by... 94%. Obviously this issue goes way beyond the abortion topic, but developed nations need to have more babies if they don't want to completely disappear soon. It is a very real and imminent threat, I would argue even more so than global warming.

In conclusion, I'm technically not opposed to abortion but it should not be celebrated and should be under very strict rules.

2️⃣ Euthanasia should be allowed if that is the wish of the person and the doctors agree.

I'll keep it much shorter for this one 😃 : If you're about to die and you're suffering (serious accident, terminal cancer, etc...) I guess so

Thank you very much both @Fleurke and @Etienne. First of all i want to say i respect that Fleurke does not want to comment. 🙏🙏

And @Etienne is right about things but he also shows why it is super difficult. When we spoke in the class about it i thought like ok super easy: the answer is YES (both times). Because i thought about if you are raped and you are also 13 or older can they FORCE you to keep the baby? And i think the answer is no. Even though i personally could NOT abort bc it does not feel right. But i can understand others if they say that they would abort and if they are a victim. And with euthanesia i thought about a person who has for example pains which are SEVERE and dont go away and they only keep him alive but he does not REALLY have a life.

BUTTT it is more difficult if for example someone gets pregnant and they just abort. And others said it can happen even MORE times that somebody aborts bc they are not careful and NOT because they are a victim. So in that case it is maybe not right that they can just do that. And i understand the argument for the baby BUTTT also in some cases if they have a mother like that who just does not care it may even be more terrible. So in that case it may be better that they dont get a baby. But of course you dont know what they baby would want if it was born. 🙄🙄🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

And there are also religious reasons for others. And people spoke about those reasons it got a bit too tensed and stressy and i really became like 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫 That is also because i really dont know anymore if there is only ONE rule if you allow abortion or NOT at all. So now i think the doctor should decide it if he agrees that it is the best. But i have no idea how he must do make that decision.

Sorry that i write in a confusing way but i just really dont know anymore what is the best for the pregnant girl (and maybe she is a victim!!) and the baby.

2️⃣ Euthanesia should be allowed if that is the wish of the person and the doctors agree.

The dilemma of Euthanesia is simply awesome. If your pet is dying in pain, you will be condemned for cruelty if you do not summon the vet to give him a general anaesthetic from which he will not come round. But if your doctor performs exactly the same merciful service for you when you are dying in pain, he runs the risk of being prosecuted for murder. Why don't we have a right for "mercy killing"? We simply take the pain, endure the indignities, and await the inevitable end in the cruel hands of time? Let's change the phrase "mercy killing" into "assistance in suicide" and ask the same questions. That's quite difficult to answer as either "yes or no." I don't like to take "life is just the misery left between abortion and euthanasia." I had my own experience in this dilemma and I've quixotically chosen "enduring the pain." Not because of that I had the fear of death, just because of that life is the life if you fight till the last man stand, and you are that last man in your very own life. As I stated before that's quite a quixotic aspect, and not valid for all. Additionally our knowledge on death is pretty limited. The way we die, might be the redemption for our previous lives, or it might be the exoneration for our next lives. We don't know anything of the true nature of existence. All we know is that we don't like pain.

2️⃣ Euthanesia should be allowed if that is the wish of the person and the doctors agree.

The dilemma of Euthanesia is simply awesome. If your pet is dying in pain, you will be condemned for cruelty if you do not summon the vet to give him a general anaesthetic from which he will not come round. But if your doctor performs exactly the same merciful service for you when you are dying in pain, he runs the risk of being prosecuted for murder. Why don't we have a right for "mercy killing"? We simply take the pain, endure the indignities, and await the inevitable end in the cruel hands of time? Let's change the phrase "mercy killing" into "assistance in suicide" and ask the same questions. That's quite difficult to answer as either "yes or no." I don't like to take "life is just the misery left between abortion and euthanasia." I had my own experience in this dilemma and I've quixotically chosen "enduring the pain." Not because of that I had the fear of death, just because of that life is the life if you fight till the last man stand, and you are that last man in your very own life. As I stated before that's quite a quixotic aspect, and not valid for all. Additionally our knowledge on death is pretty limited. The way we die, might be the redemption for our previous lives, or it might be the exoneration for our next lives. We don't know anything of the true nature of existence. All we know is that we don't like pain.

I said already before but i really mean it that you write in a super beautiful way!! I have now read it two times and one time only for seeing HOW you write. But the second time also what you said! 😛 I dont understand exactly what you experienced yourself because you considered it for somebody to ask for euthanasia? Or it was close to you or about yourself? In any case i am happy that you write often on the forum and that everybody can read what you think about topics and to see how you write about them. I wanted to make sure that you know that!!!!! 😊😊

Hello everybody! 🙋‍♀️ I hope that everybody has a nice weekend!! 😊😊🌈🌞

For today i have two statements:

1️⃣ The difference between summer and winter time should be STOPPED.

2️⃣ It depends on your body if you need breakfast in the morning!

About statement 1: THIS weekend there is the summer time in The Netherlands and i think maybe also in other countries. So we have one hour LESS (dont forget @-Kiki- and i think also @Etienne, @Sabri_KC, @Lianshen, @Esma-Nur, @Simone724 and MANYYY others 😛 😛 ). Maybe it is time to stop the time difference between winter and summer and some countries already have that.

About statement 2: It is important to have breakfast bc your body starts with working. BUTTT i chatted about it this week with somebody!! I dont tell who!! 😛 And for that person it is different.

So i think BOTH statements are true. BUTTT what do YOU think? 🙄🙄

Do you think the statements are true ✅ or false ❌

1️⃣ Abortion should be allowed during pregnancy if the doctors say so.

There is a whole thing around abortion that I found repelling. The argument about "my body, my choice", like @Etienne mentionned, or the "clump of cells" are among them, but what I have the most problems with is how men are not in the equation for abortion, while they have to take their responsibilities when it comes to child support, including is some grotesques cases. This doesn't look fair or coherent to me.

Another issue I have with abortion, because I have witnessed it, is that it is sometimes returned against women. When youu have a partner who force a woman to get and abortion, the fun suddenly disappear and the psychological problems linked to it surge much more.

For sure, giving the right to abort can be nice for some, but when I see that, I would rather restrict it to people who tried everything first - for real - not to get pregnant, as a couple, or to women for whom life is endangered, or victim of rape for example.

2️⃣ Euthanesia should be allowed if that is the wish of the person and the doctor

Why not, but what happens in case the doctors disagree, or that the person cannot give consent/communicate? what could happen in the case politicians use that to push people toward euthanasia?

1️⃣ The difference between summer and winter time should be STOPPED.

In fact, yes it should because light isn't spending much energy anymore (relatively to other devices at least), but changing time is negatively impacting our health. The problem is that we live in a marvellous place in the world called EU. Hence, even if they want to stop switching between summer and winter, they have been struggling with it for years, showing their inability in pretty much all aspects of taking decisions, even over unimportant matters.

Among other and if I remember right, the fight is between countries relying on their industry (Germany), and the countries relying on tourism (France) for their economy. Unfortunately, they do not care much about solar time anymore, despite France having a 2h lag at the moment.

2️⃣ It depends on your body if you need breakfast in the morning!

It depends on the people and their lifestyle. Most important is probably not if you eat a breakfast or not, but if you eat more or less at the same time and enough/good quality

There is a whole thing around abortion that I found repelling. The argument about "my body, my choice", like @Etienne mentionned, or the "clump of cells" are among them, but what I have the most problems with is how men are not in the equation for abortion, while they have to take their responsibilities when it comes to child support, including is some grotesques cases. This doesn't look fair or coherent to me.

Another issue I have with abortion, because I have witnessed it, is that it is sometimes returned against women. When youu have a partner who force a woman to get and abortion, the fun suddenly disappear and the psychological problems linked to it surge much more.

For sure, giving the right to abort can be nice for some, but when I see that, I would rather restrict it to people who tried everything first - for real - not to get pregnant, as a couple, or to women for whom life is endangered, or victim of rape for example.

Why not, but what happens in case the doctors disagree, or that the person cannot give consent/communicate? what could happen in the case politicians use that to push people toward euthanasia?

In fact, yes it should because light isn't spending much energy anymore (relatively to other devices at least), but changing time is negatively impacting our health. The problem is that we live in a marvellous place in the world called EU. Hence, even if they want to stop switching between summer and winter, they have been struggling with it for years, showing their inability in pretty much all aspects of taking decisions, even over unimportant matters.

Among other and if I remember right, the fight is between countries relying on their industry (Germany), and the countries relying on tourism (France) for their economy. Unfortunately, they do not care much about solar time anymore, despite France having a 2h lag at the moment.

It depends on the people and their lifestyle. Most important is probably not if you eat a breakfast or not, but if you eat more or less at the same time and enough/good quality

Thank you very much @Lianshen for writing about the statements!!! 🙂 I do have a question about what you wrote that i dont understand. So about the summer and winter time: why is it important for industry and the tourism to keep the difference? Because for example if you have a factory and you normally go to it for work at a time you can just change the work hours if you want to but dont need to change the whole time like winter and summer time! And same for tourism like a museum is open at 9 and if you want you can just change the opening time BUTTT you dont need to change the whole time zone. 🙄🙄 Sorry if this is stupid and i overlook stuff. 🙂

Thank you very much @Lianshen for writing about the statements!!! 🙂 I do have a question about what you wrote that i dont understand. So about the summer and winter time: why is it important for industry and the tourism to keep the difference? Because for example if you have a factory and you normally go to it for work at a time you can just change the work hours if you want to but dont need to change the whole time like winter and summer time! And same for tourism like a museum is open at 9 and if you want you can just change the opening time BUTTT you dont need to change the whole time zone. 🙄🙄 Sorry if this is stupid and i overlook stuff. 🙂

That's a good question and I couldn't give you a detailed answer. I saw that information years ago, and basically, it's not about keeping the difference but divergent interests. Winter time is better for energy saving and for workers health and productivity eventually because it's closer to natural rythm.

Summer time seems to be better for tourism industry because you have more daylight in the evening, and it's not just about museum, but also bars, restaurants and other touristic places. In France , we are 2h ahead of solar time (we adopted German time during the last war and never changed back...), and Brittany being even more in the west, then it's a few minutes more. Shortly, it means that, in my city, in summer, it's daylight until 10pm, and you still have dusk until 11pm almost: perfect to stay up late outside!
In winter time, or worse solar time, it would be dark at 20-21h (in June); so not as good 🙂

I may not be super clear, so let me know if you still have trouble with it.

1️⃣ The difference between summer and winter time should be STOPPED.

Yes definitely, it barely saves any money at all and is a major inconvenience on people (which has negative effects on health).

why is it important for industry and the tourism to keep the difference? Because for example if you have a factory and you normally go to it for work at a time you can just change the work hours if you want to but dont need to change the whole time like winter and summer time! And same for tourism like a museum is open at 9 and if you want you can just change the opening time BUTTT you dont need to change the whole time zone. 🙄🙄 Sorry if this is stupid and i overlook stuff. 🙂

It forces everyone to adopt this system if you change the time. What you're describing is an opt-in system in which people basically have a choice between adopting it or not, which would result in nobody doing it because it's too much hassle. Then there would be discrepancies between who's doing it and who's not which would make things even more confusing. One day it will have to go! Summer time master race 💪️💪️😁️

2️⃣ It depends on your body if you need breakfast in the morning!

If you're a child or a teenager yes I think so, if you're an adult you should just listen to what your bodies tells you : eat when you feel hungry, don't eat just because "it's time to eat" if you don't feel hungry (unless you have an eating disorder of course)

Our children have no problems getting adjusted to a new time zone when travelling abroad. The summer/winter time transition seems to be much harder to cope with. In particular getting them to fall asleep an hour earlier is somewhat similar to climbing the Himalayas wearing flip flops.

As regards breakfast in the morning: I have 10 steps to secure my morning harvest or the Valkyries may descend to earth and guide me towards Odin's great hall.