Attention: dein Browser ist veraltet und ist eventuell mit dieser Seite nicht kompatibel. Bitte aktualisiere deinen Browser um die Seite besser nutzen zu können.
That only makes sense if we already grant that abortion is wrong. Obviously, if it is, talking about bodily autonomy makes no sense. If I make a mistake out of irresponsibility, but the solution is simple, it's all good. In this case, the question is not why people have abortions or whether having made a mistake that could have been avoided justifies doing something that's morally wrong (the answer is no, of course), but whether that thing really is wrong.
I should've said, but my answer was aimed mostly at pro-abortion people, because although intuitively I lean towards thinking it should be allowed, I can only think of arguments for the anti-abortion side.
I fully approve of helping a pregnant woman keep her unborn child if she so desires.
Nevertheless, I find this current obsession with life on the part of believers astonishing. For centuries, the Church has massacred millions of well-born people in the most horrific ways without it raising the slightest qualm of conscience.
I fully approve of helping a pregnant woman keep her unborn child if she so desires.
Nevertheless, I find this current obsession with life on the part of believers astonishing. For centuries, the Church has massacred millions of well-born people in the most horrific ways without it raising the slightest qualm of conscience.
I think that's a little unfair on religion. Like, the Church itself admits that its past actions were wrong (obviously); them making mistakes (big mistakes, a millennia-long series of huge intentional mistakes) doesn't immediately invalidate their position. Plus, it's ridiculous to blame 21st-century believers for the past actions of the institution they now follow.
100%? As in there is no conceivable situation in which an abortion would be the reasonable thing to do?
For me, yes. (The only exception I know is the tubal pregnancy. There is no way - from what I know, maybe the medicine has better knowledge now? - to save the child. And the mother would die, too. But this is really the only exception I know.
Personally, I would even give my life if I could save my baby (if I had one), e.g. when cancer and pregnancy etc.