🤷‍♀️🧙‍♂️ True or false? 🙄❓

True I'm always happy when I have a dream. In Islam we always recite a verse when we have had a bad dream. For example, my son has a heavy dream and I wake him up gently and recite the verse 3 times. The things a Muslim should do if he has seen a bad dream is to seek refuge with Allah three times from the evil of the dream and the evil of Satan, saying: “Allah, I seek refuge with You from the evil of this dream and the evil of Satan who is far from Your mercy.” To ensure that the dream in Ghair changes (positively), a supplication is made. These kinds of dreams are not told to anyone.

If someone wakes up because he has seen a beautiful dream, then he should praise Allah. This dream will make him happy, he will accept it as good news. He will tell this dream to someone he loves, and definitely not to someone he doesn't love.

Hello everybody! 🙋‍♀️ I have made a statement and I am curious what you think:

➡️ Dreams are NOTTTT just random and silly but they also tell really things about the past or say things about the future.

What do you think about the statement? Do you think it is true ✅ or false ❌

I think the statement is both true and false because i dont believe it can totally say what the future is. But maybe it is more what YOU THINK. So what you guess the future is than maybe your dreams will say the same. Or if something happened in your dreams maybe some things happen again like they really happened. But I dont think that dreams are like saying things that you cant know really and that it will happen like in your dreams.

Of course, I agree with you @Yue_ because dreams sometimes reflect experiences we had in the past or deep feelings stored in the subconscious, so they appear symbolically or indirectly.

At the same time, it may express our fears or expectations about the future, making it appear to indicate what will happen.

However, it cannot be said with certainty that dreams always convey facts about the past or predictions about the future. Often times, they are just jumbled or random thoughts that are a result of what we are thinking or what we are experiencing.

Therefore, it can be said that dreams carry a mixture of facts and randomness, depending on the nature of the dream and the circumstances of the person.

Hello everybody!! 🙋‍♀️ I have 2️⃣ new statements for today:

➡️ If you are below 16 you also have the right to be on social media!!!!!

➡️ In a LOTTT of countries more than 50% of people will have too much weight (in some countries that is now already and in other countries in the future). So the government must also do something like for example have less fastfood restaurants in cities or that they make sports cheaper or more health information.

About the first statement we have not yet discussed it in our society class, but we have to react tomorrow about Australia because they make a law that you cant be on social media if you are below 16. 🙁 So i am curious what you think and i looked online and here you can read about the news of Australia: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-28/social-media-age-ban-passes-parliament/104647138

About the second statement i saw it on the news: if not something happens it will be VERY unhealthy for a lot of people and the medical costs will be A LOTTT more in the future for everybody so that is even worse than if the government takes more actions. I dont really know how to solve that second problem. 🙄🙄

What do you think about the statements? True ✅ or false ❌ ?

Hello everybody!! 🙋‍♀️ I have 2️⃣ new statements for today:

➡️ If you are below 16 you also have the right to be on social media!!!!!

➡️ In a LOTTT of countries more than 50% of people will have too much weight (in some countries that is now already and in other countries in the future). So the government must also do something like for example have less fastfood restaurants in cities or that they make sports cheaper or more health information.

About the first statement we have not yet discussed it in our society class, but we have to react tomorrow about Australia because they make a law that you cant be on social media if you are below 16. 🙁 So i am curious what you think and i looked online and here you can read about the news of Australia: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-28/social-media-age-ban-passes-parliament/104647138

About the second statement i saw it on the news: if not something happens it will be VERY unhealthy for a lot of people and the medical costs will be A LOTTT more in the future for everybody so that is even worse than if the government takes more actions. I dont really know how to solve that second problem. 🙄🙄

What do you think about the statements? True ✅ or false ❌ ?

Hi Yue,

new day, new topic. I appreciate it 😃

1. True. every parents are able to decide for themselves when their children should start using social media. it also depends on the maturity of the child. it would be nice, if it doesn't already exist, for there to be protected social media for children/teens.

2. neutral. the government can and should tax certain foods. for example, tax sugary foods more heavily and make basic foods cheaper. this is already happening in many countries. however, i would also like to say that it is everyone's responsibility to ensure that they eat a healthy diet. a ban on unhealthy foods would go too far for me and represent a strong interference in self-determination.

Have a good day!

Hello everybody!! 🙋‍♀️ I have 2️⃣ new statements for today:

➡️ If you are below 16 you also have the right to be on social media!!!!!

➡️ In a LOTTT of countries more than 50% of people will have too much weight (in some countries that is now already and in other countries in the future). So the government must also do something like for example have less fastfood restaurants in cities or that they make sports cheaper or more health information.

About the first statement we have not yet discussed it in our society class, but we have to react tomorrow about Australia because they make a law that you cant be on social media if you are below 16. 🙁 So i am curious what you think and i looked online and here you can read about the news of Australia: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-28/social-media-age-ban-passes-parliament/104647138

About the second statement i saw it on the news: if not something happens it will be VERY unhealthy for a lot of people and the medical costs will be A LOTTT more in the future for everybody so that is even worse than if the government takes more actions. I dont really know how to solve that second problem. 🙄🙄

What do you think about the statements? True ✅ or false ❌ ?

For the first statement:

I see that social media is part of our daily life, but the appropriate age to use it depends on the individual’s maturity and ability to deal with it responsibly.

If I am under 16 years old, this does not mean that I do not have the right to be on them, but the most important thing is to use these platforms wisely and with parental supervision, because the Internet is an open world and I must be aware of the risks. However, I believe that people under the age of 12 should not use social media alone, as they often lack sufficient maturity and awareness to deal with the challenges and risks found on these platforms.

So, the statement is not completely wrong, but it requires clear conditions and responsibility.

For the second statement: I believe that weight gain is a global problem that requires the cooperation of everyone, not just individuals.

Of course, the government's role here is very essential.

Reducing the number of fast food restaurants in cities may help limit the spread of unhealthy foods, but the solution does not stop there. Sports should be available to everyone at reasonable prices or even free, and there should be greater awareness about the importance of healthy food and an active lifestyle.

So, I think the statement is correct because the government must take practical steps to support community health and motivate everyone to live a healthy life.

Thank you very much @steve-san and @psysarah15!! 🙏🙏 I think that we think the same about the first statement so it is important that you can use social media and your parents know about it too. And if you are not yet 16 you could also put in the wrong birthday and you can just have an account because i know that MANY from my class already do that with other social medias. But i think you can just be on it if your parents say it is ok and you can make together that choice. 🙂

And for the second statement i think Steve is right about already there are taxes and it is a responsibility of every person. BUTTTT it is not enough i think because more and more people are still getting overweight. And if they go to the hospital for diseases later but cant pay for it because the costs are also getting more and more, there are two problems. You cant say as hospital that you cant pay so you cant come. That can be VERY dangerous. But if others have to pay, it is more expensive than for example the what @psysarah15 said as examples. So it is a difficult problem. But what happens now in most countries is perhaps not enough to stop the problem.

It is really difficult i think the second statement, but it is also a big problem!! 😬😬

Hello everybody!! 🙋‍♀️ I have 2️⃣ new statements for today:

➡️ If you are below 16 you also have the right to be on social media!!!!!

➡️ In a LOTTT of countries more than 50% of people will have too much weight (in some countries that is now already and in other countries in the future). So the government must also do something like for example have less fastfood restaurants in cities or that they make sports cheaper or more health information.

About the first statement we have not yet discussed it in our society class, but we have to react tomorrow about Australia because they make a law that you cant be on social media if you are below 16. 🙁 So i am curious what you think and i looked online and here you can read about the news of Australia: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-28/social-media-age-ban-passes-parliament/104647138

About the second statement i saw it on the news: if not something happens it will be VERY unhealthy for a lot of people and the medical costs will be A LOTTT more in the future for everybody so that is even worse than if the government takes more actions. I dont really know how to solve that second problem. 🙄🙄

What do you think about the statements? True ✅ or false ❌ ?

1) everybody should decide for themselves. And some parents should be less overprotective,because a social media becomes dangerous based on the way you use it. Kids should be aware of the risks and make the choice with the parents. I think it’s ridiculous to not let your kids install social media after a certain age. I installed instagram at 11 and i’m not saying it’s the right age but i only posted pictures of what i did on roblox and my account was private,i was careful and I knew the risks of social media. So i never had problems with it. Obviously it also depends from the maturity of the kid.

2)i think that in those countries they should also teach the kids at school about health. Also because when a kid is obese,it’s almost always the parent’s fault. They don’t realize how harmful being fat for a kid is. From a psychological way (bullying,low self esteem…) and obviously for their health,the most important thing. So they also should make sports cheaper .

thank you very much @Idkbro!!!! 🌹 did you have a haircut??? it looks really nice on your new profile photo!!! 🎗️🌸 so you are still the PPG Fashion queen!!!! 👑

for the first statement i agree what you said. ALSO about what you said about parents being sometimes too strict. for me that is bit difficult topic because my dad is SUPER strict too about for example if you post new pics even if is only from our home or old photos and we discussed rules about what i can give for example e-mail or personal things. but i think sometimes TOO many rules are not needed. AND for example you and happy and some others also take good care about others so you can help each other here too. that is also important.

and about the second statement: i think what you said is true. because what happens now is just not enough because in MANY countries it gets worse and worse. so i hope that something happens or it will be a health mega problem and also it is impossible to pay everything for the healthcare. that is just impossible at least what they say on the news.

thank you very much @Roseeeee!!!! 🌹 did you have a haircut??? it looks really nice on your new profile photo!!! 🎗️🌸 so you are still the PPG Fashion queen!!!! 👑

for the first statement i agree what you said. ALSO about what you said about parents being sometimes too strict. for me that is bit difficult topic because my dad is SUPER strict too about for example if you post new pics even if is only from our home or old photos and we discussed rules about what i can give for example e-mail or personal things. but i think sometimes TOO many rules are not needed. AND for example you and happy and some others also take good care about others so you can help each other here too. that is also important.

and about the second statement: i think what you said is true. because what happens now is just not enough because in MANY countries it gets worse and worse. so i hope that something happens or it will be a health mega problem and also it is impossible to pay everything for the healthcare. that is just impossible at least what they say on the news.

thank you very much @Roseeeee!!!! 🌹 did you have a haircut??? it looks really nice on your new profile photo!!! 🎗️🌸 so you are still the PPG Fashion queen!!!! 👑

for the first statement i agree what you said. ALSO about what you said about parents being sometimes too strict. for me that is bit difficult topic because my dad is SUPER strict too about for example if you post new pics even if is only from our home or old photos and we discussed rules about what i can give for example e-mail or personal things. but i think sometimes TOO many rules are not needed. AND for example you and happy and some others also take good care about others so you can help each other here too. that is also important.

and about the second statement: i think what you said is true. because what happens now is just not enough because in MANY countries it gets worse and worse. so i hope that something happens or it will be a health mega problem and also it is impossible to pay everything for the healthcare. that is just impossible at least what they say on the news.

No I didn’t have a haircut but i think my hair are growing a lot,thanks! And i agree with you too

No I didn’t have a haircut but i think my hair are growing a lot,thanks! And i agree with you too

I do think your hairstyle now is awesome!!! You should keep it this way! 😊😊

Hello everybody! 🙋‍♀️ This time i made a statement that is NOTTT from school from society class but because i heard something that i DONT agree with on tv and people say it a lot but i dont think it is correct. It is about this statement:

➡️ Now people are more egoistic and thinking about themselves than in the past.

I believe this statement is FALSE and INCORRECT ❌. On the news i saw a woman and she had made a crowdfunding so she could bake brownies and give them to people who go to the voedselbank. I dont know what the word is in English but it is a place where you get groceries if you dont have enough money and you get that for free. In my country it is in a lot of big cities.

And what the woman did was a HUGE success and she had to bake more than thousand brownies and A LOT of people helped her. And i know a lot of people and even if they dont have a lot of money they do help other people and are volunteer or help with a charity. And there are a lot of ways to help other people like for example on Patreon and people can make nice youtube videos and are supported that way. Or with crowdfunding or giving money to collectors for charities at the door. So a lot of people are NOT egoistic at all.

What do you think about this statement? True ✅ or false ❌ ?

hello yue i think that is partially correct . I personally think there is not much empathy left in the world. people think more about themselves and if they ever do a good deed, it is immediately posted on social media. For example, I also see every day on trains, buses or trams that people no longer stand up to give up their seats to the elderly. I still do that myself. Just now I was in a store and 2 elderly people were looking for peanut oil. and I showed them where that was. more people need to learn to listen and see what is happening in their environment. empathy does not have to be great, a simple good day can do wonders. good luck with exams

Hello everybody! 🙋‍♀️ This time i made a statement that is NOTTT from school from society class but because i heard something that i DONT agree with on tv and people say it a lot but i dont think it is correct. It is about this statement:

➡️ Now people are more egoistic and thinking about themselves than in the past.

I believe this statement is FALSE and INCORRECT ❌. On the news i saw a woman and she had made a crowdfunding so she could bake brownies and give them to people who go to the voedselbank. I dont know what the word is in English but it is a place where you get groceries if you dont have enough money and you get that for free. In my country it is in a lot of big cities.

And what the woman did was a HUGE success and she had to bake more than thousand brownies and A LOT of people helped her. And i know a lot of people and even if they dont have a lot of money they do help other people and are volunteer or help with a charity. And there are a lot of ways to help other people like for example on Patreon and people can make nice youtube videos and are supported that way. Or with crowdfunding or giving money to collectors for charities at the door. So a lot of people are NOT egoistic at all.

What do you think about this statement? True ✅ or false ❌ ?

I think this statement is false.

It is true that life has become faster and technology has affected us, but this does not mean that people have become more selfish. In fact, I see that there are a lot of initiatives and situations that demonstrate that people still care about each other, perhaps in different ways than in the past. The methods may have changed, but human values ​​such as cooperation and assistance have not disappeared.

Hello everybody! 🙋‍♀️For today I have two statements and i am curious what you think:

1️⃣ If countries took art from colonies or other countries, they have to give it back when it is requested.

2️⃣ If there are statutes of a hero from colony powers, it cannot be removed by protestors.

I think for statement 1 it is true if for example it was stolen. But false if it was taken but it would be destroyed and therefore it was protected (for example if it was taken away from a country where it would be destructed).

And for statement 2 i think it is true and protestors cant do that. If people want to remove a statute it should be discussed and also if somebody did something wrong because what we think now it is different than if in that time it was not wrong how people saw it. But it can never be destroyed because some people think it, but there should first be discussion about it.

What do you think about these statements? True ✅ or false ❌ ?

Hello everybody! 🙋‍♀️For today I have two statements and i am curious what you think:

1️⃣ If countries took art from colonies or other countries, they have to give it back when it is requested.

2️⃣ If there are statutes of a hero from colony powers, it cannot be removed by protestors.

I think for statement 1 it is true if for example it was stolen. But false if it was taken but it would be destroyed and therefore it was protected (for example if it was taken away from a country where it would be destructed).

And for statement 2 i think it is true and protestors cant do that. If people want to remove a statute it should be discussed and also if somebody did something wrong because what we think now it is different than if in that time it was not wrong how people saw it. But it can never be destroyed because some people think it, but there should first be discussion about it.

What do you think about these statements? True ✅ or false ❌ ?

For the first statement:

My opinion is that there is a lot of truth in it, because countries that took art or heritage from their colonies or other countries must respect the right of these countries to restore their cultural property if they request it.

Art and heritage represent part of people's identity, and it is unfair for them to remain outside their original places.

But there can be exceptions, such as if the art is better preserved or available to the world where it currently is, then compromises can be sought that satisfy both parties.

For the second statement:

I think it is half true, because statues of heroes of colonial powers represent part of the heritage and history, just like the Roman occupation of Egypt or other occupations that left behind traces that we preserve until now. These statues may be considered a record of a certain period of history, and help attract tourists to understand that era.

However, if the people feel insulted or that the presence of these statues symbolizes injustice, they have the right to demand their removal, provided that this is done in a peaceful manner that respects heritage and society.

I will replay when the little one sleep @Yue_

Thank you very much @Fleurke!! 🙏 🙂

And I agree with a lotttt that you wrote @psysarah15!! And I think that it is a good example that you give for example about Roman heroes. Because if we judge them now maybe people dont agree what they did but at that time they were in their societies heroes so it becomes different and we dont want a lot of Roman statutes or buildings destroyed and why would it be different for other heroes of the past. But if a lot of people dont like a statute or something else like for example a painting they can together decide if it has perhaps to be removed. But in some countries statutes were destroyed by small groups of protestors and that is never good i think. 🙄🙄

Thank you very much @Fleurke!! 🙏 🙂

And I agree with a lotttt that you wrote @Sarahsalah27!! And I think that it is a good example that you give for example about Roman heroes. Because if we judge them now maybe people dont agree what they did but at that time they were in their societies heroes so it becomes different and we dont want a lot of Roman statutes or buildings destroyed and why would it be different for other heroes of the past. But if a lot of people dont like a statute or something else like for example a painting they can together decide if it has perhaps to be removed. But in some countries statutes were destroyed by small groups of protestors and that is never good i think. 🙄🙄

1/ its true they most return it . I do not agree with the 2nd because I am not in favor of statuses. For example, in Belgium the 1st king of the Belgians is everywhere in the picture in places, but he was not a good man. so I would rather not see his statue