Not for my country, but maybe for freedom. And I believe, the question we have to ask to ourself is what we mean by "our country"? Is it the country itself (the land), the nation or the state?
Better stay alive for your country. Dead people makes no family, no family makes no community, no community makes no nation, no nation makes no country. In epagogic approach you should live but in hypothetico-deductive reasoning you should die.
I get it when some of You say: "better don't die, it's good to be living" but You must be aware that soldiers are also protectors, not only invaders. And without their service, many things would just go in the worst direction for nations, for humans.
The truth is, there always will be bad forces in one form or another. So there also have to be good force, to defend people.
Depends. I would die if people of my country fight against fachists like Hitler. But I wouldnt want to die for a senseless; brutale war.
And ofc I'd die for my family...for the ones I love
I think that would depends on the situation. If I have a choose, I would not. Because sometimes it's worth more alive than dead.If my country were at war, I wouldn't choose to be a soldier or just bringing a gun to shoot the enemies like some heroes in the human history did. Because this is death for me, and I'm really bad at using force, and I don't know anything about weapons. I may choose to contribute to the victory of my country in other ways that I am good at. But if I don't have a choice, I might.