Many thanks Michael for this initial excursion as a visitor on foreign soil. Michael and I operate in vastly different worlds and any exchange should be treated in kind - with the threat of "lost in translation" ever looming.
I will not interfere in Michael's contemplations on script and respect its underlying beliefs as his personal view. This comes with the clear reservation that such "openness" is prevalent on a mutual basis.
This ties in well with my previous reference on reinstating the Rubicon in its past significance. I received an enquiry about its meaning - hence a brief explanatory note. In Roman times the crossing of the Rubicon river was deemed in the eyes of the law to constitute an attack on Rome itself. Caesar's bold and decisive move following the conquest of Gaul to lead his legion across waters marked his actions as high treason and meant that an attack was imminent. Reinstating the Rubicon in a proverbial setting can be considered as a waiver of past defaults and the conclusion of a standstill.
I will leave this platform now to Michael as its initial creator and only venture across borders upon invitation. In any case this forum has the ingredients to conjure a new foundational Trivium of classic disciplines.


