A common feature of a peace treaty is the inclusion of a preamble. In essence this preliminary part serves as an explanation of the scope and content of the relevant treaty and the underlying purposes pursued by the contracting states. In overly complicated - some would say eloquent - words the true and genuine commitment of such signatories are put on scroll.
A true commitment to resolve the never ending conflict in the ME region in a peaceful manner may be lacking at least with some of the main actors. Parties who are devoid of true commitment are mere occupants of seats at the negotiating table.
I have a genuine admiration for your attempts to provide a first sketch of one of the most complex legal instruments which are generally heavily negotiated by large international teams of experts. But uncommitted parties in one of the most hot rodded environments on earth are unlikely to be attracted to your proposals.
I have conveniently disregarded a broad spectrum of other indispensable ingredients - insurmountable hurdles? - to foster long lasting peace in the ME. Every signed document starts with a commitment to comply with its content.
It remains a tragic and continuous tale of destruction.
Thank you very much!!! But still i think we should think about how it can work bc i think everybody from all those countries are tired and the real victims from everything. Leaders should not keep the war if everybody else is sick of it.
For everyone saying no to nuclear, nuclear energy is considered pretty clean energy. I prefer nuclear energy vs our traditional sources. Regarding nuclear weapons, it's sort of unfair that only some countries in the world have nuclear weapons and they can use these weapons as a threat to bully other nations. I personally believe that no country should have nuclear weapons or all countries should have them. Are the countries that possess nuclear weapons more able to police the world state because of the threat? We understand why countries want it to be known that they have nuclear weapons. It does provide a measure of safety when enemies know you have nuclear capability.
I hope younger generations do a better job of preserving this world than my generation and the ones before.
I think that NOBODY should have nuclear weapons BUTT ALSO not nuclear power. That is bc if you have nuclear power than you can develop nuclear weapons. And i dont trust any country anymore with nuclear weapons. Not USA, Russia, China, India, England and any other country. And even if they can be trusted always you can get smb who is like Trump or Putin and i believe anything can happen. That is just too dangerous.
