🙏✌️ Peace in the Middle East ❤️🌍

Can i add one more thing too? I agree with @Etienne that Iran should not do the nuclear programme. BUTTT i also think that about America, China, India, England and all the other countries who have nuclear power. The reason is maybe stupid but i still believe it: now in America there is Trump. I believe that everything can now happen any time and i dont trust Trump. And the same is true in Russia. Putin can do anything. And even if countries are normal and dont act unexpected: ALWAYSSSS there can be a person who is the new leader and does strange things suddenly. And if they have nuclear power it can be VERY heavy damage and people also react with the same weapons.

So it is not only Iran. It is every country who has nuclear power. I dont trust any person with it. Also not for example any leader from my country. Nobody!!!

I'm not denying history, I'm merely pointing out that European involvement was almost a century ago and the reasons behind the current conflicts stem from, in no specific order:

- Israel creeping on neighboring land

- Hamas conducting terrorist attacks on Israel

- Iran not respecting anti nuclear agreements

Bringing up Europe to explain these matters is a stretch to say the least.

Europe has a dwindling economy, shrinking population, tiny military budget, and experiencing a serious democracy crisis across most of the continent. It has become completely irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.

In my opinion, the only country which deserves to have nukes with it is Israel, it is a constant fight for survival for them, while I condemn their oppressive regime in Gaza, Hamas had to be vanquished but NOT at the cost of innocent lives, and it is right @Parsaa that Ayatollah Khamenenei (Forgive me for the spelling) has repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel and thus can NOT be trusted with nuclear bombs, for the day he has a good number of them, he will without any doubt fire them at Israel, and regardless of who is right or wrong nuclear bombs are never an option, so in order to ensure that Israel is not levelled to the ground, it is best if Iran does not get nukes, and from another perspective, Iran has ongoing tensions with US and Pakistan both of which are also nuclear powers, the unchecked usage of nukes is a concern in regards with Iran not only to the region but to the world as a whole. And no @Parsaa I seriously think that the fact that Iran has said 3 F-35's are shot down is propaganda. Europe might be dwindling BUT it is not yet irrelevant in the global scheme of things, Russia, Germany and France are at their epitome in military technology and Germany is also an economic powerhouse, besides we are speaking and communicating in English which is if anyone has not noticed a European language besides who does not like cakes and pastries which if it is not obvious are the gifts Europe gave to this world.

So what is Israel doing now? Its only goal is to achieve the "New Middle East" project, as you say, changing borders for peace will not bring about these old wars, so Israel's work is not in the direction of peace! In the new map they drew, they only divided the interests of the Middle East countries into small, powerless parts, and even attributed parts to themselves. Separating peoples like the Kurds and making them independent is not in the direction of freedom, they clearly want to spread the powers to such an extent that it becomes meaningless on its own. And acquiring the River of Egypt and also building a strategic river that can only be built by occupying Palestine are also among their other goals. If I explain Israel's goal, which is an evil goal and leads to the consolidation of power in its own country, it is false, then this also proves that France's support for Israel is also wrong and is exactly the opposite of the "freedom" that you are talking about. It's true, Europe may not have caused these conflicts and its goal is to help, but Europe is not the cradle of freedom, nor has it been particularly helpful! If you want us all to be realistic, Europe is Trump's intermediary and will be crushed under his feet.

At all @TheLOVERofMachines is totally right. Not Europe, but Britain, as a mindset. Also, a big help to Ukrainians you did. At all, i dont want to either blame or appreciate you. A part of what @TheLOVERofMachines wrote, had a little good point, about differences of how you hear the news in different parts of the world😁

again i say, im not against Europe and believe that they are a big help to our world, but they might not be successful many times, because of veto of USA and britain.

Also, i have a question for people who believe Iran shouldn’t have neuclear energy, why not?😁 really looking forward to your answers.

Finally, Chris, why do you think that absolute power in the region is in the hands of Israel? Israel clearly has no power on its own and its size is no larger than any of the provinces of Iran. Iran currently has two missiles for every hundred square meters of Israel. There is no doubt about Iranian missile capabilities, and we have advanced technology.

Our army's ground forces are not comparable to Israel at all, our army may not have guns, but the courage they have can defeat anything. Iranian war tactics have been excellent and perfect since ancient times, an example is the partisan tactics of Sardar Sorena.

And we will see geopolitical changes with Iran's decisive victory in this war. Iran will become the axis of the Middle East and Saudi Arabia and Turkey will rely less on America and more on us. Occupied Palestine will return to its people. The Middle East will remain the same, only a big old mother named Iran will take care of everyone. Of course, Israel will not end, they will probably fall at the feet of England again and an African country will be theirs.

But you who are in Europe, know that the truth will eventually be revealed. There are always bits of truth that come to man, even if a great wall prevents it from being seen (Netanyahu's propaganda). Don't listen to cyberspace, don't listen to the occupation regime, respect your ears and listen less to Netanyahu's lies. Iran is definitely the absolute power of the Middle East, if America does not enter the war, Israel will be uprooted, because the real power is in our hands, you only see a false image of Israel that a propaganda genius like Netanyahu has created. I think you all know what attack Iran made on Israel last night, missiles with new technology, and you saw that it targeted Israel's own defense, you saw that Iran destroyed several F35s and caused millions of losses to America.

In the end, my point is this:

The truth cannot be hidden. It will be revealed. A bright future awaits you...

Be happy you will get rid of the Mullahs

Be happy you will get rid of the Mullahs

And who will come after them? A civil war? Anarchy like that in Libya? Iranians must decide their fate. The future of Iran must not be decided by Netanyahu and Trump. These two gentlemen 🙄😬😡🤬do not have the qualifications to decide. Moral qualifications.

Or like in Syria. But I guess the population has done with religious leaders.

The only thing which is to be controlled are the revolution guards to not happen a second IS

For everyone saying no to nuclear, nuclear energy is considered pretty clean energy. I prefer nuclear energy vs our traditional sources. Regarding nuclear weapons, it's sort of unfair that only some countries in the world have nuclear weapons and they can use these weapons as a threat to bully other nations. I personally believe that no country should have nuclear weapons or all countries should have them. Are the countries that possess nuclear weapons more able to police the world state because of the threat? We understand why countries want it to be known that they have nuclear weapons. It does provide a measure of safety when enemies know you have nuclear capability.

I hope younger generations do a better job of preserving this world than my generation and the ones before.

Thank you everybody for posting!! Can i ask if you believe that it is possible to make REALLL peace in the Middle East and do you think that my points work or do you think we need to change some points or add things?

And @Parsaa in our news there were pictures of a lot of people who tried to get out of Tehran. I hope that you are safe now and ALL your family too. 🙏🙏 I dont know if you can read this still but we think of you EVERYBODY here on PPG!!!! ✨🌸🌼

A common feature of a peace treaty is the inclusion of a preamble. In essence this preliminary part serves as an explanation of the scope and content of the relevant treaty and the underlying purposes pursued by the contracting states. In overly complicated - some would say eloquent - words the true and genuine commitment of such signatories are put on scroll.

A true commitment to resolve the never ending conflict in the ME region in a peaceful manner may be lacking at least with some of the main actors. Parties who are devoid of true commitment are mere occupants of seats at the negotiating table.

I have a genuine admiration for your attempts to provide a first sketch of one of the most complex legal instruments which are generally heavily negotiated by large international teams of experts. But uncommitted parties in one of the most hot rodded environments on earth are unlikely to be attracted to your proposals.

I have conveniently disregarded a broad spectrum of other indispensable ingredients - insurmountable hurdles? - to foster long lasting peace in the ME. Every signed document starts with a commitment to comply with its content.

It remains a tragic and continuous tale of destruction.

I think the Situation in middle east is comparable to Europe in beginning 20ths century.

A few powers compete for being a meaningfuland dominating power on the continent instead of working together.

And after a great war every one knows its boundaries. Maybe every continent have to walk through this development. In religious and political way.

Regarding nuclear weapons, it's sort of unfair that only some countries in the world have nuclear weapons and they can use these weapons as a threat to bully other nations. I personally believe that no country should have nuclear weapons or all countries should have them. Are the countries that possess nuclear weapons more able to police the world state because of the threat?

You're making the assumption that all countries are equally reasonable and well intentioned. Would you put North Korea on the same level as Switzerland?

You're making the assumption that all countries are equally reasonable and well intentioned. Would you put North Korea on the same level as Switzerland?

The same Switzerland which consciously allowed the Holocaust in WW2 era Germany. In my opinion they feign neutrality but in the event of a NATO conflict with Russia they would support NATO albeit discreetly, nah, only Israel deserves nukes, the rest of the countries don't deserve them. Countries like North Korea and Pakistan are rogue nations who should get sanctioned for possessing nukes.

A common feature of a peace treaty is the inclusion of a preamble. In essence this preliminary part serves as an explanation of the scope and content of the relevant treaty and the underlying purposes pursued by the contracting states. In overly complicated - some would say eloquent - words the true and genuine commitment of such signatories are put on scroll.

A true commitment to resolve the never ending conflict in the ME region in a peaceful manner may be lacking at least with some of the main actors. Parties who are devoid of true commitment are mere occupants of seats at the negotiating table.

I have a genuine admiration for your attempts to provide a first sketch of one of the most complex legal instruments which are generally heavily negotiated by large international teams of experts. But uncommitted parties in one of the most hot rodded environments on earth are unlikely to be attracted to your proposals.

I have conveniently disregarded a broad spectrum of other indispensable ingredients - insurmountable hurdles? - to foster long lasting peace in the ME. Every signed document starts with a commitment to comply with its content.

It remains a tragic and continuous tale of destruction.

Thank you very much!!! But still i think we should think about how it can work bc i think everybody from all those countries are tired and the real victims from everything. Leaders should not keep the war if everybody else is sick of it.

For everyone saying no to nuclear, nuclear energy is considered pretty clean energy. I prefer nuclear energy vs our traditional sources. Regarding nuclear weapons, it's sort of unfair that only some countries in the world have nuclear weapons and they can use these weapons as a threat to bully other nations. I personally believe that no country should have nuclear weapons or all countries should have them. Are the countries that possess nuclear weapons more able to police the world state because of the threat? We understand why countries want it to be known that they have nuclear weapons. It does provide a measure of safety when enemies know you have nuclear capability.

I hope younger generations do a better job of preserving this world than my generation and the ones before.

I think that NOBODY should have nuclear weapons BUTT ALSO not nuclear power. That is bc if you have nuclear power than you can develop nuclear weapons. And i dont trust any country anymore with nuclear weapons. Not USA, Russia, China, India, England and any other country. And even if they can be trusted always you can get smb who is like Trump or Putin and i believe anything can happen. That is just too dangerous.

This is not true. You need a Lot of technology knowledge to built a nuclear weapon which works in reality and not theory! Otherwise whole Europe would have those weapons.

This is not true. You need a Lot of technology knowledge to built a nuclear weapon which works in reality and not theory! Otherwise whole Europe would have those weapons.

Why does most of Europe need nukes, they are expensive after all, they have NATO protection?

Thank you very much!!! But still i think we should think about how it can work bc i think everybody from all those countries are tired and the real victims from everything. Leaders should not keep the war if everybody else is sick of it.

I think that NOBODY should have nuclear weapons BUTT ALSO not nuclear power. That is bc if you have nuclear power than you can develop nuclear weapons. And i dont trust any country anymore with nuclear weapons. Not USA, Russia, China, India, England and any other country. And even if they can be trusted always you can get smb who is like Trump or Putin and i believe anything can happen. That is just too dangerous.

Well said, but nuclear power is a boon, it is a clean form of energy and while you can make nukes with it, you don't have to make nukes with it, examples of this are Denmark, Bangladesh and Canada, we should restrict the misuse of nuclear power, not benefitting from it is like having a knife in a kitchen but not using it to cut veggies only because it can be used to kill. We need to properly use nuclear energy and not misuse it. No some wars are essential too, for example Russia and Ukraine. But seriously, Trump and Putin need to be kept away from their respective nuclear buttons.

Since Trump is hatching a plan in which he is going to attack Iran, what do you guys think about how peace can actually be achieved.

In my opinion:

1) Kill Trump, anyhow nobody likes him AND make sure USA keeps its long nose out of this, they have been eying Iranian oil for too long.

2) Destroy any chance of Iran getting nukes.

3) Ensure Isarael does not attack any civilian whoever it may be.

Remember: The Iran declared Israel the war. And Iran overrated their abilities. Iran hasnt even a border to Israel, so what is the Intention of Iran?

Iran dont need to wonder at all. They earn what they seed the last 40 years.

Remember: The Iran declared Israel the war. And Iran overrated their abilities. Iran hasnt even a border to Israel, so what is the Intention of Iran?

Iran dont need to wonder at all. They earn what they seed the last 40 years.

The intention is very simple: Bring Islam to what they think is a Muslim country and kick out the jews.

Yes and the thought of the Mullahs "Every Nation in Asia and middle east will lay us at feet when we can treat with a nuclear weapon"

Yes and the thought of the Mullahs "Every Nation in Asia and middle east will lay us at feet when we can treat with a nuclear weapon"

Precisely, they think they can influence USA with nukes