" Haizi's poems". He is a great and talented poet.BUT
emmmmm......Maybe beacuse my experience and knowledge is poor.I think it's just🥑.I prefer like the poems by Tagore
I personally don’t like Harry Potter, I probably should have read the books first and only then watch the movies. Since I did the controversial, the books are no longer interesting for me.
Romeo and Juliet. I had to read it for school and for me there's just NOTHING romantic in it. The whole relationship between them is just unrealistic. You don't even know what they love so much about each other.
I'd disagree, people then differ a lot from people now. And their relationships were much different, as well as the society and the way people were raised. And I'm surprised that you don't know that it is the people who are loved and not *something* in them.
I'd have to agree with Romeo and Juliet, the whole story just doesn't make a lot of sense even if you regard the time it was written in. Especially the whole "oh no she is dead, no I have to die; oh no she wasn't dead, but now he is, so I have to die as well" is just plain bs. I don't get why people think it's romantic to commit suicide because someone didn't tell you in time that the love of your life is just sleeping and not dead. Totally overrated story
I know that you should love a person and not something in them. I explained it wrong, sorry. But they were engaged and found the love of their life after meeting ONCE and talking like three words with each other. I just don't think that's realistic.
One Hundred Years of Solitude
I like Marquez's books but I didn't really understand it. I prefer The General in His Labyrinth and Love in the Time of Cholera.
Lord of the Flies. It's really brutal and children are not children there.
If you are really 14, you read this book at the wrong time. This book shows things we can understand only when we have a life experience
Yeah, that's probably true. Although, interestingly, it is often regarded as a 'children's' book by many libraries/websites.
I know that you should love a person and not something in them. I explained it wrong, sorry. But they were engaged and found the love of their life after meeting ONCE and talking like three words with each other. I just don't think that's realistic.
I mean it's not really about realism, it is a different genre. Realism is not the focus here, it is more about the greed of humans and the general definition of 'the power of love'. And as to 'overrated' story, there had been many readaptations of this book, and lots and lots of modern plots are based on this play. There should be some reason there, shouldn't it?