Again I'm sorry about your accident, it feels like it affected you very deeply.
So no I don't agree with you that the economy should come before climate change.
I never said that money is more important than our planet, I said that there's something delusional - and even sometimes manipulative - about exclusively focusing on what the West does, dismissing what the rest of the world is up to. Again I think it's good that we're doing things, but it renders them virtually useless if the worst offenders aren't willing to take part in any effort. What I'm trying to say is let's keep the energy, but shift it a little bit.
I think our "salvation" will come with technological improvements, which needs a strong economy to flourish. Tesla and SpaceX are good examples: cash flow combined with great engineering is allowing them to make massive leaps that greatly reduce the footprint in their industries. It's really unfortunate that some people think burning down electric cars is the right call to make.
At one time I might have agreed with you that climate change cultiness is cultiness. Unfortunately that time is past. Not because I have joined the cult. Because I have read the science. We are at a major tipping point. Once we cross it and last I checked we were less than 12 years from hitting it, there is no saving the planet. What is all the money in the world worth to people too dead to spend it? On this issue, we are staring down the barrel of a gun set to fire within the next 12 years after which there is no way to save anything. The was is over. It literally is now or never.
I'm going to be completely honest, I think this is typically the kind of counterproductive speech that drives people away from climate change issues. It sounds like Earth will explode at the flip of a switch in 2037. This is a quite dramatic thing to say, and one doesn't need to be a climate change expert to figure it's just as likely to happen as the infamous 2012 doomsday, no matter how many times "science" is stamped in caps. I think there's got to be a middle ground somewhere, although yes some areas of the world are in a very bad position, it's very uneven. Could you please share the firsthand scientific studies you have read on this? I am genuinely interested.
Yes, wood burning creates particulates in the air. Wood breaks down and you wind up with that weather you burn it or not.
This is technically true, but natural decay creates significantly less pollution - on an order of magnitude. You can tell by the insane amount of black smoke that gets generated when forests burn, there is a big scalability problem with wood burning, it's only acceptable if few people do it.
TThe US wasn't at risk in that regard until a couple months ago. Now everyone is scared of Trump, and they are waging war on things like Public Broad Casting and NPR. So YES those things ARE now at risk. And to placate an orange luantic just a few days back PBS, had on a truck driver and a highly decorated doctor to discuss vaccines as if they were equals on the subject. The USA, isn't what it was just a few months ago. Major and dramatic and dangerous changes are taking place. Just look at the world stock market today. You want to talk about stuff that is BS? Tariffs. Things are happening here very quickly. People are being kidnapped on the streets who have every right to be here.... And that is just the beginning. It is only going to get worse. So it is important to stay connected to people now who have access to information from sources that are NOT operating with a gun to their head.
You're mixing lots of unrelated things here, I'll just respond to a couple of things if I may:
- I don't think "everyone is scared of Trump", I would venture to guess your personal circle is, given Trump won the popular vote.
- Who are these "people are being kidnapped on the streets who have every right to be here"? This is a very serious thing to say and I want to learn about this, it's terrible! (I assume you're not referring to illegal immigrants; that wouldn't make sense)
I expect internet crackdown because everything is getting cracked down on. All sources of information. I think it won't happen tomorrow but I don't know when it will happen. I fear that it will because that is what dictators do. They shut down access to information that may offer a different story than they are offering.
What are examples of effective crackdowns? You probably want to read the Twitter files or listen to Mark Zuckerberg's statements from a few months ago (I would be happy to provide the exact sources). They explicitly mentioned the collusion they both had with the FBI to prevent Trump from winning last time and to censor right-wing opinions on social media. This also applied overseas, French right-wing accounts were shut down without providing a reason. Can you name people being censored for their political opinions? Hell, just 4 years ago the sitting President of your own country got banned on a social network because calling his supporter "American patriots" was "inciting violence". How was that not the ultimate crackdown? If you did align with your current convictions back in the day and opposed this ban, kudos to you.
The entire presidential campaign was about defending free speech for Republicans and censoring fake news for Democrats (you probably know this better than I do). It sounds anachronistic to complain in 2025 about a crackdown on opinions when you're literally describing the pre-Trump/Musk world. The authoritarian ideology is not the one you think it is, as a matter of fact it is the main reason why they lost the election.
Full disclosure: I don't even like Trump as a person, I think it's unfortunate that he's the President, but this doesn't mean we should make up an alternative reality