That's exactly how to be a good mom, parents need to keep track of what their kids do online and how long they spend on their phone. That said, it is ultimately the parents' responsibility and not service administrators to educate children. Fun story: I remember getting an email a few years ago from a mom who said she uses PPG with her disabled teenager who didn't have many friends in real life. He was able to make friends online, it was a very fulfilling experience for him as her mom was supervising his activity. She was very thankful she found the community and it made my day.
Agreed. I once helped get a Sudanese friend I met on Interpals, into a scholarship program through the US embassy to study at UNC -Chapel Hill..she was 16 when we started pen-paling and I was 43. We still keep it touch to this day.
Adults cannot contact minors by default. If they can, it means the minor took action to disable their privacy settings. PPG is meant to protect users as best as possible, but it isn't designed to be a prison either. If you crash your car after turning off the airbag and get injured, should the car manufacturer cover your hospital bill? 😛
Thank you. Rigid rules tend to invite the Streisand Effect. Teens are going to find a way around them. I don't recall having to upload my ID to PPG when I created an account. Minors masquerading as adults is a MASSIVE recipe for disaster.
This is already how it works: machine learning is used to detect fraudulent or otherwise "risky" accounts. It doesn't really have predetermined rules, it just learns over time and adapts. It has worked very well because it finds similar patterns. Of course it isn't bulletproof, nothing is. But I would genuinely be surprised if other penpal sites do a better job than PPG in this department.
From my perspective, it's leaps and bounds better than Interpals.
The platform was initially designed with this in mind. However I went back on that for 2 reasons:
- legally speaking, GDPR requires all personal information to be editable by users, even what it supposed to be permanent (😑️)
- it doesn't prevent people from making fake accounts right off the bat
It doesn't mean I'll never do it, but the effectiveness would be very limited due to the latter.
Users must be respectful and refrain from inappropriate talk. The reporting feature is a core component of how moderation is handled: it's essentially community driven. When someone (or something) is reported multiple times, they may end up getting blocked or banned automatically. The system decides what is most appropriate. That's why it's important to block or report when you see something bad. Of course there needs to be a valid reason, unfortunately the report feature is routinely abused as a way to retaliate against other members for stupid reasons.
With all due respect to Follower, this is exactly why I am very wary of trying to report anything that whiffs of offense. I was once banned from a forum with the subject "What is the appeal of Nazi Uniforms." Did i say something offensive, did I make holocaust jokes? Nope. I said "maybe it's because they have that slick, art-deco appeal."
Another time we had a rather odious pro-life guy in a chat. People have a right to their opinions, but he was rude and would make his attacks personal if you disagreed with him. He had me banned because I stood up to his bullying.
Need I go on? Contentious and divisive topics are going to pop up. Strong language might be used (curse words are a routine for some of us here whether we are angry or not). Are we going to go down that road? I hope not. I've seen puritanical people absolutely kill discussion boards and websites because dealing with them is such a headache and they are the first to complain why the boards are "dead."
Also. Bans. I understand they are necessary. Are they permanent? Do those that get banned have a right to plead their case? What will happen to those that abuse the reporting feature?
I get you, but if they need a space dedicated to inappropriate behavior then they should probably refrain from it altogether. What's next, a safe space for p*rn? 😛. I'm not willing to go down that slippery slope. Like you said, private messages are already private.
I hate to say this ... but what is defined as "inappropriate," other the obvious (pron, suggestive discussions towards those under 18, etc.)? We have a forum discussion up about weird swear words, I've been toying with starting a forum asking people what are things that can inadvertently cause offense in their culture....or better yet.. what if someone puts "occult corner" or "atheist clearinghouse?" Discussions in those rooms might cause offense to someone. Better yet @Korisnik made some comments above that Muslim friends i have would find highly offensive. He has a right to make them though. Would it be right for someone to ban him because their feelings might be hurt?
Elephant in the room. Did what happen yesterday get out of hand? Yes. Do I think it was meant at anyone in particular...no. What i saw was simple shock value. I guess I'm used to stuff like that though.
Maybe good old age categories would be good enough instead of subject based forums, I have to think about all the consequences it entails. I just want to avoid any detrimental gatekeeping, but I'm sure there is room to find a good balance between protecting minors and .
@Yue_ deputizing you for this, since you're a popular poster among the over AND under 18 crowds. And you are better suited to police the under 18s.
How about simply putting "+18" in the title of any majority age discussions. Will it stop younguns from coming in? Probably not. Will they see the content? probably? But since they aren't supposed to be there, posters can't be blamed for targeting them. And those that repeatedly ignore warnings can cool their heels in Bantown.
Example "(+18) What's the worst thing that happened to you on a date?"
Just my $2 there.