4, no?
If someone is born a guy but wants to become a girl, and marries a guy who was born a girl, so they consider it a hetero relationship. Then one day the girl who was born a guy wants to become non-binary and lose the girly looks. So, then the guy who was born a girl now considers himself straight!
If someone is born a guy but wants to become a girl, and marries a guy who was born a girl, so they consider it a hetero relationship. Then one day the girl who was born a guy wants to become non-binary and lose the girly looks. So, then the guy who was born a girl now considers himself straight!Difficult...
If someone is born a guy but wants to become a girl, and marries a guy who was born a girl, so they consider it a hetero relationship. Then one day the girl who was born a guy wants to become non-binary and lose the girly looks. So, then the guy who was born a girl now considers himself straight!So first of all, both of them are in a hetero relationship in the beginning and could therefore say they're straight. So the trans-woman identifying as non-binary, doesn't "make" the trans-man straight, he was already straight because he's a man and he's into women.
In any way, their sexuality has nothing to do with the question about how many genders there are. Being non-Binary makes statements like "heterosexual" and "homosexual" tricky, because it undermines the person saying they're non-binary, by basically assigning them a specific gender.
Unrelated to the non-binary situation, looks (as in "lose the girly looks") don't have much to do with sexuality either. A lesbian who's into masculine looking women is still a lesbian. A straight woman who's into feminine looking men is still straight, and the men are still men.
Also, looks don't necessarily relate to gender. Just because someone is female presenting doesn't mean they can't be non-binary or a man. Being non-binary doesn't mean that you have to lose your "girly looks". Demi Lovato also identifies as non-binary, but if you look at pictures of them, they are very much not androgynous looking.
I didn't understand anything...If someone is born a guy but wants to become a girl, and marries a guy who was born a girl, so they consider it a hetero relationship. Then one day the girl who was born a guy wants to become non-binary and lose the girly looks. So, then the guy who was born a girl now considers himself straight!So first of all, both of them are in a hetero relationship in the beginning and could therefore say they're straight. So the trans-woman identifying as non-binary, doesn't "make" the trans-man straight, he was already straight because he's a man and he's into women.In any way, their sexuality has nothing to do with the question about how many genders there are. Being non-Binary makes statements like "heterosexual" and "homosexual" tricky, because it undermines the person saying they're non-binary, by basically assigning them a specific gender.
Unrelated to the non-binary situation, looks (as in "lose the girly looks") don't have much to do with sexuality either. A lesbian who's into masculine looking women is still a lesbian. A straight woman who's into feminine looking men is still straight, and the men are still men.
Also, looks don't necessarily relate to gender. Just because someone is female presenting doesn't mean they can't be non-binary or a man. Being non-binary doesn't mean that you have to lose your "girly looks". Demi Lovato also identifies as non-binary, but if you look at pictures of them, they are very much not androgynous looking.
One or the other buddy, most will choose, if they do not, then that represents the indecisiveness of one who desires to “change” gender. Most anyone’s getting out of me is possibly a “they”Why can they not live the way they were born? Don't you think it's rather hard of you to call somebody indecisive just because they feel perfect the way they were born?As far as I know, these people usually get this surgery while they're babies, obviously without asking their opinions on it. I would say as long as there's no negative effect of whatever going on, people (especially babies and children) should not be getting surgery just because they look different. I'm not a doctor, but I would think that every surgery goes along with complications and possible negative repercussions. I don't think babies should be put up to that risk just because society feels that they don't belong.
Additionally to that, you don't know what the person would've chosen if they could've, because they're a baby and can't make decisions yet. They might feel trapped in the wrong gender once they're older.
They shouldn't be getting surgery before they can make an educated decision on it.Therefore, they'd have to get surgery, if at all, when they're older. Teenager maybe, or fill grown adult. Definitely older than 10 years. So what are they until then? There's only men and women, according to you, but they're neither male nor female. What are they until they decide if and when to get the gender affirming surgery? Do they not have a gender, or sex even?