PPG University > Curiosities in Roman Laws Всякая всячина

Part I

As the bedrock of Western civilization, Ancient Rome has left an indelible mark in the history of mankind. History books are naturally full of their achievements, glory, victories. But are there some peculiarities that often escape the pages? If we focus on the laws and regulations in Rome, the answer is yes...

"The laws are like spiders’ webs: just as spiders’ webs catch the weaker creatures but let the stronger ones through, so the humble and poor are restricted by the laws, but the rich and powerful are not bound by them." --Valerius Maximus

First thing first. By law, Roman citizens began to divide for so-called honestiores and humiliores. The first group focused people on the so-called “noble” birth, among others: senators, high officials, municipal councilors, the emperor’s wealthiest emissaries, as well as officers of the highest military rank. The second group was constituted by the rest of the citizens: free peasants, coloni, freedmen or craftsmen. That's crucial in Roman society since punishment must fit the social status, not the crime's itself. Therefore it's difficult to say that every citizen is treated in the same way. For example, a member of the group humiliores for a heavy crime was killed by wild animals or tortured; in turn, honestiores the worst could be sentenced to quick death (preferably beheading. Yes it was a noble privilege). Honestior was sent to exile, and humilior went to mines, where he usually ended his life. Moreover, honestior could appeal against the sentence to the emperor (omitting the images of the majesty of the ruler or treason).

As Suetonius narrated at once "When a guardian poisoned his ward in order to inherit his property, Galba had him crucified. The man invoked the law, saying that he was a Roman citizen and therefore not liable to such punishment. As if he were intending to mitigate the punishment as a consolation befi tting the man’s status, Galba ordered that his cross be set up much higher than the others and painted white."

In A.D. 61, the city prefect, an ex-consul named Pedanius Secundus, was murdered by one of his slaves, either because Pedanius would not free him after a price had been agreed or because of sexual rivalry. Ancient custom ordained that when a slave killed his owner, all slaves living under the same roof should be executed. Even though so many of them were women and children whose innocence was obvious, the Senate resolved to adhere to this practice, ignoring massive public protests and appeals for mercy: all four
hundred of Pedanius’s household slaves were executed.

Being a slave in Rome was not easy at all. By law The testimony of slaves was admissible only if obtained through torture.

By Lex Julia, the wearing of the toga, a garment that was a symbol of Roman citizenship. The law stipulated that only the Emperor could wear a completely purple toga, a color associated with royalty and power. The law against wearing purple was a “sumptuary law,” and These laws were strict. If you weren’t a citizen, you weren’t allowed to put on a toga let alone the purple one. Purple dye was incredibly expensive. It had to be imported from Phoenicia, where they made the dye from mollusks.

If a man caught his wife having an affair, he was encouraged to lock his wife and her lover up and call every neighbor he could to come see. He had 20 hours to call as many neighbors as he could and invite them to check out the guy his wife has been sleeping with. He then had three days to make a public declaration describing where he found his wife, who was having sex with her, and any extra juicy details he could supply. He was also legally required to divorce his wife, or else he would be charged with pimping. He could murder his wife’s lover if he was a slave or a prostitute. If it was a citizen, though, he would have to talk to his father-in-law. Fathers, in Rome, could legally murder their daughter’s lovers no matter how nice of a toga they wore.

Roman society was a patriarchal society and in Rome, patricide was considered one of the most socially offensive crimes. The punishment for such an offense in Latin was: "poena cullei."

If someone was found guilty of patricide, they were blindfolded and told that they were unworthy of light. They would then be taken to a field outside of the town, stripped naked, and beaten with colored rods. When you couldn’t take anymore, then put you in a sack, throw in one serpent, one dog, one ape, and one rooster, and you and your whole menagerie would all be sewn in there together and thrown into the sea or the river. Constantine the Great, gave up the punishment of poena cullei in his brutal form, only agreeing to put the snake in the sack. The punishment was later imposed in the Byzantine Empire.

Roman ladies all had naturally black hair. Natural blondes, in Roman time, were barbarians, especially the Gauls. Since the prostitutes couldn’t be associated with the dignity of a proper Roman woman, they had to make themselves look like barbarians, so they made them dye their hair. Being a prostitute in Rome wasn't easy either. Roman prostitutes -meretrices- were required to obtain a license, pay taxes, and wear blonde hair as a mark of her profession.

In some circumstances, committing suicide was just considered prudent thinking. Kings typically kept poison on hand in case things turned bad, and sick people would be encouraged to drink hemlock to put an end to their suffering. The only people who couldn’t commit suicide were soldiers, slaves, and prisoners, and this was just for economic reasons. In one area, they even had a formalized system to request suicide. A depressed person could file a petition to the senate requesting death, and if the senate agreed they really were better off dead, they received a free bottle of poison.

Lightning strikes, the Romans believed, were acts of god performed by Jupiter. If something got hit by a lightning bolt, it wasn’t bad luck. Jupiter just really hated it. Whether it was a tree or a person, Jupiter had decided it was time for it to go. If it was your friend who got hit, you were legally forbidden to lift the body above the knees, and you definitely couldn’t bury his body. If you did, you’d stolen a sacrifice from Jupiter. They let people make up for it, though. If you buried someone who got hit by a lightning bolt, the Romans would sacrifice you to Jupiter instead.

Earlier we already mentioned on patriarchal society in Rome. Fathers in Rome had the legal right to temporarily sell their kids. An agreement would be made between the father and a buyer, and the son would become the buyer’s possession. The buyer, as part of the bargain, was expected to bring the kid back home.

Anyone who sold their child into slavery three times, though, was considered an unfit father. Their child would have to finish his third session as a slave because a deal is a deal, but afterward, he would be legally emancipated from his parents.

In the early days of Rome, there was no limit to what a father could do to his family. He could dole out any degree of abuse he could imagine. That didn’t just mean he was allowed spanking: If his children misbehaved, he could straight up murder them.

Fathers held on to those rights even after their kids grew up. Daughters still had to fear their fathers after marriage, and his sons only earned independence when their fathers died.

By time, Rome relaxed these laws a little bit. The right to murder family members ended in the first century BC, although, even then, they kept a few exceptions. Now, the law said, fathers could only murder their sons if they’ve been convicted of a crime.

PART II

Romans had a set rules they called “usuacpio,” which were laws on how long you had to possess something before it became your property. If you held onto anything long enough, it could become legally yours, including people.

Wives, legally, became their husbands’ property if they stayed in his house for one straight year. But if she really wanted her freedom, she could have it—as long as she left her house for three continuous days each year. So, every year in Rome, women would leave their homes and hide somewhere else for a few days, or else become possessions.

Commiting the crime of rape was not a smart thing to do in Ancient Rome. In ancient Rome, a rapist had his testicles crushed with two stones. In ancient Rome, rape – unless it was committed by the rulers – was punished severely. The victim was given a hammer and a stick, and with the help of these devices, it could beat his tormentor at will. The punishment for rape ended with particular cruelty at the hands of the executioner, who strangled the already beaten rapist with his own hands. Emperor Macrinus, for the rape of a maidservant by two soldiers, applied an unprecedented punishment to them: he ordered the criminals to be sewn into the ripped bellies of the bulls so that only their heads stick out. At first, both rapists were fine and even talked to each other, but after two days they died in agony from blood poisoning, amid unimaginable stench. Gruesome way to die indeed.

"Maiestas" was a term in Roman law that referred to crimes against the majesty of the Roman people, similar to what we might today call treason.

The concept of maiestas was broad and could encompass a range of offenses, from plotting against the state to degrading its honor and dignity.

The most serious form of maiestas was "laesa maiestas" or "injured majesty," which involved direct acts against the Roman Emperor.

The punishment for maiestas could be severe. One such punishment was "aquae et ignis interdictio," which translates to "interdiction from water and fire."

This was a form of banishment in which the convicted person was forbidden to use or be near fire and water, which were considered the basic elements of life. In practical terms, it meant that the person was exiled and could not live within the borders of the Roman Empire.


This punishment effectively stripped the person of their Roman citizenship and all the rights and protections that came with it. They were considered an outcast and were left to fend for themselves in foreign lands. This was a severe punishment in a society where citizenship was highly valued and offered significant legal and social advantages.

On this point, we should mention on "Homo Sacer." A definition of homo sacer is found in Festus, who states 'homo sacer is est quem populus iudicavit ob maleficium; neque fas est eum immolari, sed qui occidit parricidi non damnatur'. Homo sacer is defined in legal terms as someone who can be killed without the killer being regarded as a murderer; and a person who cannot be sacrificed. The sacred human may thus be understood as someone outside the law, or beyond it. The term sacred man could also have been used because the condemned could only rely on protection of gods.

The "ius osculi", the "right of the kiss", was a custom introduced by Roman law. A woman was supposed to kiss her husband, father and brother on the mouth every day. This gesture, only apparently affectionate, allowed the men of the family to "test" her breath to verify that she had not drunk wine.

For this violated an ancient law that equated a woman's drinking with disgrace and adultery. It was therefore punishable by death. A woman caught drinking wine could be disowned or killed by her husband with the consent of her closest relatives. But this prohibition applied only to honest women and not to the notorious probrosae, i.e. actresses, dancers, tavern waitresses.

Only Roman citizens could join the legion. But he gave up the right to an appeal to the Emperor. The legate in charge of the legion had the power of life & death. If a unit retreated, they were decimated. The men drew lots & the one soldier who got the short end of the stick was beaten to death by the other nine. Brutal but not enough in Roman standarts.

For thousands of years in ancient Rome, young women were chosen to devote their entire lives to make sure a fire in the Temple of Vesta never went out. These were the Vestal Virgins, chosen for their purity at a young age to keep the gods happy in order to bring prosperity to Roman civilization. Vesta was the goddess of fire, and they believed that a sacred fire in the temple needed to burn 24/7 in order to make her happy.

These girls spent all of their youth bound by their duty. They could not fall in love or get married, and many of them stayed in the religious order their entire lives. Despite being bound by the cult of Vesta, these women enjoyed a life of fame, fortune, and political freedom that other women in Rome were not allowed to have at that time. They also had the ability to pardon someone of their crimes.

Attacking a vestal virgin was one of the worst crimes anyone could ever commit, because they were seen as a direct connection to the gods.
Even though the vestal virgins were powerful, independent single ladies, they still needed to follow the rules. If the fire of Vesta ever went out, the girl who was responsible was taken into the Pontifex Maximus, or high priest’s dungeon, where she was forced to strip naked. Then, the priest would whip her, leaving scars to remind her of that mistake for the rest of her life. To make matters worse, if anything bad happened immediately after the fire went out, they would assume that the gods were angry, and all of the blame rested on that girl’s shoulders.

If a vestal was suspected of breaking her vow of chastity, the head priest superstitiously believed that the soul of Rome was weakened because of it, or that society was losing their connection with the gods. The punishment for having sex was death. Since no one was allowed to be buried within the confines of Rome, and no one was allowed to harm a vestal virgin, they got around this rule by building an underground tomb. They carried down a comfortable chaise lounge to sleep on, and a day’s worth of food and water. The woman was forced to climb into the dark tomb, and they would close her inside. She became trapped in total darkness, where she could feel her way to the chaise, eat, and wait to die. After a few days of being underground with very little air and food, she would eventually die from starvation. While these incidents were very rare, In 114 B.C., a vestal named Marcia was caught having a lover, and she was sentenced to underground burial.

The Tarpeian Rock (or Saxum Tarpeium, as it was known in Latin), was part of the Capitoline Hill on the west side of the city of Rome. The Tarpeian Rock itself was used for executing a variety of criminals; the sources mostly mention traitors meeting their end there. The Twelves Tables, Rome’s first code of law, says that slaves caught committing ‘manifest theft’ would be thrown down as well.

Pomerium, (from Latin post-moerium, “behind the wall”), in ancient Rome, a sacred open space located just inside the wall surrounding the four hills—the Esquiline, the Palatine, the Quirinal, and the Capitoline—of the early city. Pomerium represented a sacred boundary. According to Livy, violating the pomerium was akin to stretching the human body too far. The magistrates who held imperium did not have full power inside the pomerium. They could have a citizen beaten, but not sentenced to death. This was symbolised by removing the axes from the fasces carried by the magistrate's lictors -personal bodyguards -. It was forbidden to bury the dead inside the pomerium. Praetorian Guards were allowed in only in civilian dress (toga), and were then called collectively cohors togata. Provincial promagistrates and generals were forbidden from entering the pomerium.

As Publilius Syrus Sententiae said: "lex videt iratum, iratus legem non videt" - "The law sees an angry person, but an angry person does not see the law." Yet there is something to ask: "What about an entirely angry society?"

🧑‍🎓🧑‍🎓 Thank you very much Professor Diogenes!! 🙏🙏 It is a very scary story about the Romans!! 👀 They are very cruel so I dont understand why all the Roman people and the slaves and others did not demonstrate like now happens a lot! So the laws are changed to normal. 🙄

I remember what Etienne wrote in the forum post about if the world is collapsing that many times people think that also in history. If I lived in the Romans time it is a LOTTT worse than now I think. Because for so many things they can punish you or kill you. 😵😵‍💫 Would you choose and live with the Romans or Spartans what you wrote in the earlier PPG class or now? I am curious about that!! 😳🙄 I would choose now if i had that question!! 🍀⭐

🧑‍🎓🧑‍🎓 Thank you very much Professor Diogenes!! 🙏🙏 It is a very scary story about the Romans!! 👀 They are very cruel so I dont understand why all the Roman people and the slaves and others did not demonstrate like now happens a lot! So the laws are changed to normal. 🙄

I remember what Etienne wrote in the forum post about if the world is collapsing that many times people think that also in history. If I lived in the Romans time it is a LOTTT worse than now I think. Because for so many things they can punish you or kill you. 😵😵‍💫 Would you choose and live with the Romans or Spartans what you wrote in the earlier PPG class or now? I am curious about that!! 😳🙄 I would choose now if i had that question!! 🍀⭐

Demonstration wasn't a valid option in those times. You would have had two options: keep silent or uprise. Revolt would lead you onto the cross. It is said 6,000 slaves were crucified along a 120 mile stretch of the Appian Way after the Spartacus Slave Uprising. It was the way for Rome to demonstrate their mighty power. Regarding the question, I'd rather to live with Spartans than Romans.

Rather with Spartans than now?!

Thank you for your lecture, Professor Diogenes 🙏
I already edited it in News Report

Christine

Rather with Spartans than now?!

Thank you for your lecture, Professor Diogenes 🙏
I already edited it in News Report

Christine

If the comperation criteria is "now", an absolute "yes" comes from me. Thanks for the edition. As fast as the Fulgora. 🙂

Yes, I am like a goddess 🦸‍♀️⚡

Good to know you prefer the NOW!

I didn't really like the Romans already, but I think this definitely will make the balance in favour of the Greeks for me!

Some questions though:
- Do records mention how common was it for a patriarch to use his power and murder, sell them etc.? I suppose that things like murder might not have been so common for the law to be relaxed later?

- What about Damnatio memoriae? It seems that the practice was well spread in Rome, at least for Emperors like Nero (with various effectiveness I guess). More than that, I am curious about how this sentence was forgotten? Did it become more "quiet" with the time? Are we simply not using it anymore or as much?

I didn't really like the Romans already, but I think this definitely will make the balance in favour of the Greeks for me!

Some questions though:
- Do records mention how common was it for a patriarch to use his power and murder, sell them etc.? I suppose that things like murder might not have been so common for the law to be relaxed later?

- What about Damnatio memoriae? It seems that the practice was well spread in Rome, at least for Emperors like Nero (with various effectiveness I guess). More than that, I am curious about how this sentence was forgotten? Did it become more "quiet" with the time? Are we simply not using it anymore or as much?

The concept of Patria Potestas was deeply rooted in the Roman Republic, but we can easily state that it has continued to be influential throughout the Roman Empire as well. By time, the rights attached to it became steadily more diluted by disuse. In extreme cases, this could include the power to sell children into slavery or even to kill them, although such actions were generally frowned upon and could lead to social ostracization. "In extreme cases" is the key phrase in this statement. But yet for a long time, it was exercised under the licence of "in extreme cases." Patria Potestas is frequently referenced in various historical texts, legal documents, and even plays and poems of the era. One of the most famous examples can be found in the writings of the Roman historian Livy, who recounts the story of Lucius Junius Brutus. The influence of Stoic philosophy, which gained prominence during the late Republic and early Empire, also played a role in the evolution of Patria Potestas. By the reign of the Emperor Hadrian (r.117-138) the power of the father over the lives of his children had been diluted so far that a father who killed his son lost his Roman citizenship, his property was confiscated and he was sent into exile.

There is one surviving example of Damnatio Memoriae. If you look at the painting of the Severan family on the Severan Tondo in the Altes Museum in Berlin. Today, the tondo clearly portrays Septimius Severus, his wife, and his son, Caracalla, as a smiling family, while Geta’s face has been not-so-subtly scraped from the portrait. Because Caracalla declared a damnatio memoriae against his late brother Geta. We can also check the damnatio memoriae declared against Domitian. Or against Caligula. These cases were unsuccessful and conspicuous “erasures.” Because "damnatio memoriae" had the opposite effect on communal memory. We remember Nero, Caligula and Domitian perfectly well because of their their negative attributes. We can easily state that it has intended to serve to reset the political landscape in the era rather than erasing the name and whole memory.

Are we still using it? Yes we are. Several years ago, Ukraine removed all statues of Lenin from the country in an effort to move on from its Soviet past. That's a perfect tool of fixture on former legacies. Mankind never discards such handy tools. I mean never. 🙂