Islam

And abt violence: i think every religion has ppl that were violent. I dont know if it is bc of those ppl and that they are just saying or that they believe that the religion says that. Or that the religion really allows it. I am not sure so i cant say anything abt that for ANY religion. I know that what we believe of Buddhism is that violence is NOT ok. And if others say that abt their religion i believe that.

Have to agree about this: in every religion, there are people who are violent and are only using their religion as a blunt-force instrument against other people. That's not ok. But at the same time, I can find concord with anyone who uses their religion (or humanist atheism for that matter) to try and make themselves a better person.

No religion is uniform with followers who are clones of each other. In every religion, there are different kinds of branches. The militant branches in every religion tend to be full of horrible human beings and at the same time, the peaceful, loving branches of each religion are full of people, who, while imperfect and stumbling, still try to do good things and be good people. In either case, I don't care what your religion is, I just care if you are using it to be a better person or to hit people who are already hurting.

It's very normal, personally, when i see those who have the same religion as me but them using religion as a tool of oppression, manipulation, harm, etc ofcourse, I really hate it. because it's clear they don't really carry out what is in religion, but will only damage the image of religion which is pure with their detrimental actions.

Religions certainly have a useful side: they can unite a community and mold submissive individuals who will accept even the worst things without protest. Islam, like each of the three major monotheistic religions, is based on texts full of scientific nonsense and horrific stories. It's no wonder this stupefies people and triggers endless wars. Islamic societies have never produced democratic governments nor promoted respect for human rights. In this respect, it seems to me to be the worst.

Religions certainly have a useful side: they can unite a community and mold submissive individuals who will accept even the worst things without protest. Islam, like each of the three major monotheistic religions, is based on texts full of scientific nonsense and horrific stories. It's no wonder this stupefies people and triggers endless wars. Islamic societies have never produced democratic governments nor promoted respect for human rights. In this respect, it seems to me to be the worst.

It’s important to recognize that generalizations about entire religions can be misleading. Islam, like other major religions, has a rich and diverse tradition, and there are strong democratic and human-rights-oriented principles within Islamic teachings. For example, the Qur’an emphasizes consultation (shura), justice, and the protection of life and property—concepts that can support participatory governance and accountability. Many Muslim-majority countries have functioning democracies, such as Indonesia and Tunisia, which demonstrate that Islam itself is not inherently opposed to democracy.

Moreover, non-religious or secular countries are not automatically democratic or humane. History shows that authoritarian or violent governments can exist in secular contexts as well, like North Korea or parts of Eastern Europe under communist rule. Therefore, it is more accurate to evaluate the political culture, institutions, and leadership of a society rather than blaming a religion itself.

Religions certainly have a useful side: they can unite a community and mold submissive individuals who will accept even the worst things without protest. Islam, like each of the three major monotheistic religions, is based on texts full of scientific nonsense and horrific stories. It's no wonder this stupefies people and triggers endless wars. Islamic societies have never produced democratic governments nor promoted respect for human rights. In this respect, it seems to me to be the worst.

Well, there are very liberal muslims, though, so it's not impossible that some islamic nation would go in that direction. There aren't any christian nations that support human rights, either. Some have taken steps to that direction, but every nation on this globe has a lot of room for improvement.

Qual è la tua opinione sulla fede islamica ?

Essendo io stessa musulmana, percepisco opinioni contrastanti in tutto il mondo. Alcuni basano le proprie opinioni sull'attività terroristica islamica e credono che l'Islam sia la causa di questi attacchi: io sono assolutamente in disaccordo. L'Islam insegna ai suoi seguaci a non ricorrere mai alla violenza e alla rabbia, poiché ciò può arrecare danno ad altre persone, e non dobbiamo nuocere ad altri esseri umani perché dobbiamo considerarli creature del nostro Creatore e rispettarli. Eppure, c'è chi continua a usare il nome dell'Islam per compiere queste attività, affermando di diffondere il messaggio di Allah SWT in tutto il mondo. Altri basano le proprie opinioni su alcuni regimi oppressivi e sul loro atteggiamento ostile alla libertà femminile. Come donna, sostengo tutte le donne in questi paesi, stati, ecc., nella loro lotta per la libertà e per liberarsi da ogni oppressione.

Sono semplicemente curiosa di sapere cosa ne pensate, quindi non esitate a rispondere. Mi piacerebbe molto leggere altri commenti dal forum. xxx

Dico solo che non vedrai mai un buddista, un cattolico o uno shintoista riempirsi di tritolo e farsi esplodere

Islam is beautiful.. just that some people use it for own benefit,power etc like other religions. 🙏🙏🙏

Dico solo che non vedrai mai un buddista, un cattolico o uno shintoista riempirsi di tritolo e farsi esplodere

Non sono d’accordo. Gli attentati suicidi non hanno nulla a che fare con la religione e certamente non sono una tattica usata solo dai musulmani. Nel corso della storia molti gruppi diversi hanno utilizzato questo tipo di attacco, come ad esempio i piloti kamikaze del Giappone durante la Seconda Guerra Mondiale. I media e l’Occidente descrivono il mondo islamico come una religione oppressiva e violenta, quando in realtà questa non è affatto la realtà per molte persone. Molti musulmani sono semplicemente vittime di organizzazioni estremiste. Ma questo esiste ovunque: non molto tempo fa l’IRA operava in Irlanda, uccidendo il cugino della regina. Questo dimostra che non si può giudicare un intero gruppo religioso sulla base delle azioni di persone radicali. Non sto assolutamente difendendo nessuna delle azioni compiute da questi gruppi radicali.

Non sono d’accordo. Gli attentati suicidi non hanno nulla a che fare con la religione e certamente non sono una tattica usata solo dai musulmani. Nel corso della storia molti gruppi diversi hanno utilizzato questo tipo di attacco, come ad esempio i piloti kamikaze del Giappone durante la Seconda Guerra Mondiale. I media e l’Occidente descrivono il mondo islamico come una religione oppressiva e violenta, quando in realtà questa non è affatto la realtà per molte persone. Molti musulmani sono semplicemente vittime di organizzazioni estremiste. Ma questo esiste ovunque: non molto tempo fa l’IRA operava in Irlanda, uccidendo il cugino della regina. Questo dimostra che non si può giudicare un intero gruppo religioso sulla base delle azioni di persone radicali. Non sto assolutamente difendendo nessuna delle azioni compiute da questi gruppi radicali.

Sta di fatto che le gli attentati compiuti in nome dell'Islam non sono minoranze come fu per attentati di altre religioni. Io vorrei che nella mia nazione e l'Islam sia vietato

Vietare l’Islam non eliminerebbe la violenza politica. La violenza non è causata da una religione in sé, ma da specifiche condizioni politiche, sociali e storiche, oltre che da interpretazioni estremiste che esistono in molti contesti diversi.

L’idea che l’Islam nel suo insieme promuova la violenza è inaccurata. La grande maggioranza dei musulmani non sostiene l’estremismo ed è spesso essa stessa vittima di esso. Giudicare un intero gruppo religioso sulla base delle azioni di una piccola minoranza è ingiusto e incoerente.

La storia dimostra che la violenza e la persecuzione non sono limitate a una sola religione o cultura. Per esempio, durante la Seconda Guerra Mondiale, la Germania nazista ha commesso crimini terribili contro il popolo ebraico. Tuttavia, oggi non consideriamo tutti i tedeschi come estremisti né li riteniamo collettivamente responsabili per quelle azioni.

Lo stesso principio dovrebbe valere per i musulmani. Non è ragionevole né etico generalizzare su un’intera popolazione globale basandosi sul comportamento di una minoranza.

Se l’obiettivo è un mondo più pacifico e stabile, allora bisogna concentrarsi sul contrasto all’estremismo ovunque esso si manifesti, promuovendo allo stesso tempo comprensione, convivenza e rispetto reciproco tra religioni e culture diverse, invece di escluderle o vietarle.

I don`t care. Believe what you want. Religion is a private matter you should keep it that way. Don`t bother other people who don`t wanna know in what god you believe.

Vietare l’Islam non eliminerebbe la violenza politica. La violenza non è causata da una religione in sé, ma da specifiche condizioni politiche, sociali e storiche, oltre che da interpretazioni estremiste che esistono in molti contesti diversi.

You are almost there; now consider that Islam more than any religion is a powerful political tool and that the Qu'ran is a text of law. That muslim countries show very distinctive patterns and that their history show a spread of the religion through the blade above all others.

The fact that you mention Germans during 1930's is interesting too: Yes, most Germans were probably not extremists and most likely had no desire to resort to violence, yet, we all know that Germany and Japan made awful things in 30-40's. You don't need to have a majority of "evil" people to get into a very bad situation, but to get an environment that can bring most people to support you and support the extremist view.
Like you said, the same applies with Islam, at least in non-muslim countries.

Some people here seemingly haven't seen how the West has changed with Islam and compliance towards it. It would be better to each have our own places and get Christians and Atheists in Europe and Muslims in the Islamic world. Alas, for some reasons many people want to run away from the Islamic world and still bring Islam in their luggages.

If someone has come from an Islamic country to the western world and they still choose to practice their faith they are not escaping their religion! I think many people who immigrate to Europe, UK, America etc are seeking employment opportunities with better pay. For the longest time in history many weastern countries have exploited countries like mine (Pakistan) for their natural resources and have undermined the citizens position. I think it’s only fair if they have equal opportunities to moves accross border for and improved quality of life.

You have emphasized all your response on my last sentence while completely ignoring the rest, especially about cultural and legal aspect linked to the practice of Islam. That speaks volumes.

Please, don't bring the taqqiya and the victim card game on the table.

You have emphasized all your response on my last sentence while completely ignoring the rest, especially about cultural and legal aspect linked to the practice of Islam. That speaks volumes.

Please, don't bring the taqqiya and the victim card game on the table.

You’re right, I shouldn’t have responded based on a small part of what you said. I just felt it necessary to explain why people may immigrate. For many Islamic functioning countries they do use the Quran as primary texts for their constitution but when radical or extremist groups are formed they tend to undermine why the Quran says. For example ISIS and their horrific actions against the Yazidi community. I remember watching their actions as a young teenager and feeling repulsed by what they did because the Quran says to treat everyone equally regardless of differences yet based solely on their culture and religion they carried out mass atrocities. I think extremist groups like this should be separated from Islam. I’m not sure if that answers what you wrote or if I have just completely misunderstood what you said but that’s my opinion. 🙃

At the end of the day, every religion is an umbrella, holding many kinds of things. We should always take care to judge people as individuals, not as groups.

And let's also consider that just because people come from a predominantly Islamic country, they might not be Muslims. They might even have been born and raised Muslim and still not be Muslim. I was born and raised Christian, but I found that stuff to be oppressive so I've since walked my own path. It's the same with many Muslims raised in oppressive branches of their religion, only they might not be able to openly say they are no longer Muslim because they might receive death threats from their extremist relatives.

In my country, there are Christian cults who, if someone says they are no longer a member, the other members won't even say hi to them if they cross each other on the street, even if they were parent and child while in the cult. These kinds of cruel and intolerant practices often lead someone who leaves a cult to pretend they are still a member in order to keep contact with those members of their family who were kind to them. I'm ready to wager this happens a lot with extremist Muslims too: the person who wants to distance themselves move far away, then maintain some sort of outward trappings of Islam but in their hearts they don't think they are Muslim. In the extremist circles of any faith, apostasy seems to be leading the apostate to trouble, so therefore I can well understand why some might keep pretending they hold to a faith they have actually abandoned. That's why a lot of the Muslims in the west are actually those who are not extremists, because they have needed to escape their own extremist relations. Just like here in the land of Christian cults, many who leave their native area they leave because they want to breathe and not be members of an extremist cult.

If we want to be concerned with religious extremism, which is a good thing, we should be concerned about all extremist cults of all religions, instead of chasing members of one religion regardless if they are extremist or not. And btw. Christian extremism is very much in the rise in the west and often these Christian extremists, instead of looking at their own misogynistic and LGBT+ hostile attitudes want to point fingers at Muslims as a blanket group. Coincidence? I think not. Point fingers loudly enough and there's a chance that the sins of the Christian extremists go unnoticed.

I believe that there is only one truth and one true religion...I´ve studied the Islam and also the Quran for many years in private to detail...but the Islam cannot answer the very basic question: why did God create the world and the human beings? (whereas the Catholic Church has a simple, logic and beautiful answer: from love). Also, the author of the Quran does not mention or know the most essential truth about God: "God is love".

The Crucification is denied without any proofs just saying it is a lie - whereas we have many historic proofs for the opposite. In many countries it is forbidden to study the Quran critically.

Furthermore, the truth is timeless. God will never reduce His moral values. E. g. polygamy and divorce was strictly banned by Jesus Christ. - Muhammad reintroduced both.

However, I am glad that muslims value the virginity of Mary and pay great respect to her.

I hope you will respect my honest opinion and please don´t feel offended. God bless ✨

I deeply respect your opinion but I think it’s important to answer some of your questions or confusions. In Islam we believe this life is a test, those who pass it will be sent to heaven and those who fail it will be sent to hell. Allah SWA created humankind to know and worship him (Quran 51:56), to exercise moral responsibility (Quran 2:30) and to freely choose god with one’s own choice (67:2).

Regarding the concept of love, in the Quran Allah tells his people he loves them and this is shown in many ayats e.g. 5:54 - He loves them, and they love him, 3:31 - God will love you and forgive your sins etc. Allah has 100 names and one of them is Al-Wadud translated as the most loving. I know the meanings may differ but Allah loves his people.

Prophet Mohammed (PBUO) allowed polygamy only under the circumstances that the man ensures all 4 wives are treated with equality.

Divorce was introduced to prevent any harm.

This is based on what the Quran teaches, and it’s not said to offend anyone or their religious beliefs.