First thing first, racism is the nastiest form of ignorance. Right after this basic emphasis we are able to analyze the problem using some rational mind. First we should define what we're facing to. Racism? Not really. We are facing to some term such as neo-racism. Neo-racism as an ideological construction refers to a process of inclusion and exclusion. A neo-racist approach in which anti-immigration comes to the fore is opposed to pluralism in a social, cultural and religious sense. A neo-racist adopts a monist national culture that does not allow multiculturalism and makes a sharp distinction between native culture and marginalised cultures, and emphasises the incompatibility and conflict between these cultures. A neo-racist bigotedly believes the superiority of national culture to others.
In recent years, populist politicians in Europe have often advocated anti-immigrant sentiments to cover up their policy failures, and so, they justified xenophobia. Immigrants in populist discourse are often seen as the cause of increasing crime rates and economic, social, cultural, and political crises. It's to mean perfectly useful tool of the "goat of sin." In each economic and political crisis in Europe, immigrants are a target of extreme right-wing rhetoric and threatened with expulsion from the country in which they live despite acquiring citizenship rights.
Neo-racists advocate that immigrants should not be allowed to live in their country as they harm their national and cultural identity.
Now, let's touch the "real" problem. Immigration problem is quite solvable with correct integration, immigration and border policies. How to solve the problem of arising "neo-racism"? That is not a "single-use, disposable" tool. For instance, suppose that all non-Westerners have been swept away from Europe and as in their famous course "Europe is for Europeans." We all know that Europe is nothing but a political illusion. Then shall these neo-racists abolish theirselves peacefully? Or shall they start a new race for finding the "most superior" in Europe? They would have been justified xenophobia. These developments are alarming.
What is alarming about these developments is the “new modernized right” is often
characterized by a toned down anti-democratic rhetoric, , including a significant reduction of its previous anti-Semitic shibboleths, and a generic
willingness to behave in a way compliant with basic principles of liberal
democracy. Instead of using overt forms of biological racism and antiSemitism, the new right emphasizes the incompatibilities of different
cultures in order to legitimize its opposition to international immigration and ethno-cultural diversity. Neo-racists often claim that "Others are culturally unassimilated, ideologically
unassimilable and transnationally implicated in disloyalty.” As once Hitler said: “the Jew always remains the Jew." One shouldn't carry a scorpion in the pocket.
I recall some quote: "For the last few years, we have been taught that it is our duty to remember. That is certainly a positive development. Yet the doctrine
that urges us not to forget the crimes against mankind is accompanied by the hope that this memory will prevent us from repeating
the atrocities of the past. But without the duty to think, the duty to
remember will be meaningless."
All in all, if a saviour needed, it shall not come from those neo-racist, populist, and opportunist movements. I haven't seen any super hero killing his villain at all.