πŸŽ“πŸŽ“ PPG University -Universe ---- Alien planet > Life on other planets Tutto e niente

Life on other planets

Short answer: Almost certainly.

Longer answer: It is certain that life can arise in the universe. Just look in the mirror. Shortly after the Big Bang, the universe consisted almost entirely of hydrogen and helium atoms, and there was no life. Now there is. Even though we don't know exactly how life originated on Earth, we at least know that it did.

The universe is extremely vast, both in space and time. It is therefore very unlikely that a process that can take place in the universe only happens once. That statistical argument alone makes it very likely that life must have emerged in many other places in the universe.

It is now clear that at least half of all stars are surrounded by one or more planets, and that the organic building blocks of life are abundantly available in interstellar matter. This suggests that the formation of life was not such an unlikely process. Moreover, life on Earth emerged very early in geological history, which also suggests that this was not a 'difficult' or unlikely process.

Astronomers and (asto-)biologists therefore assume that the Earth is not the only 'living planet' in the universe. However, exactly how rare extraterrestrial life is is unknown. To date, traces of alien organisms have never been found on other planets (or moons) in our own solar system.

Future research into the composition of the atmospheres of exoplanets may reveal whether biological activity occurs on the surfaces of those planets. And of course it is in principle conceivable that today or tomorrow we will receive a radio message from an alien civilization, or that an alien spaceship will land in Times Square. It should be noted that, according to evolutionary biologists, it is extremely unlikely that the evolution of life on another planet would necessarily lead to the development of intelligent, technological civilizations.

So for the time being there is no evidence for the existence of extraterrestrial life, but the chance that life has emerged on just one small planet in the vast universe is considered negligible by almost everyone.


Life on Mars:

Mars is a lot like Earth, but its atmosphere is much thinner, the average temperature is much lower, and the planet has no significant magnetic field. This means that the conditions on Mars are very hostile to almost every conceivable life form: there is little or no (liquid) water, and harmful radiation from space reaches the surface unhindered.

However, research on Mars by unmanned space probes in orbit around the planet and by landers and carts on the surface has shown that the planet must have had a much more pleasant climate a few billion years ago, shortly after its formation. The atmosphere then had a much higher density, and due to the greenhouse effect of that atmosphere the average temperature was above the freezing point of water. Seas and oceans almost certainly existed on Mars in that distant past.

If the newborn red planet showed many similarities with the newborn Earth at the time, it cannot be ruled out that life also arose on Mars. Traces of these Martian bacteria might still be found in carefully selected and studied Martian soil samples.

However, the chance seems quite small that any Martian life has survived the major climate change on the planet. The cause of that climate change, in which Mars lost most of its atmosphere and water, is still not well understood, although the planet's small size probably played a decisive role.

Optimists still think that microorganisms might lie close to the surface of Mars. Future Mars research, including through the European-Russian Mars Express project, may be able to provide answers to this question.

And here an docu about we think how alien live look like Alien planet(58 min.) Youtube

Modificato da Daniel-Mulder .

Thank you very much for your very nice lecture space teacher Daniel!! πŸ™πŸ™ I will watch the youtube movie but now I have question because you said it is almost certain there are aliens. But if we have people on earth and that happens because of nature, is it maybe possible that all animals we have on earth and also the humans that maybe on another planet far away you have same animals and humans and not like strange ufos as in movies? πŸ‘½πŸ›Έ I hope the question is clear because it is difficult subject! πŸ™‚ πŸ˜›

Thank you very much for your very nice lecture space teacher Daniel!! πŸ™πŸ™ I will watch the youtube movie but now I have question because you said it is almost certain there are aliens. But if we have people on earth and that happens because of nature, is it maybe possible that all animals we have on earth and also the humans that maybe on another planet far away you have same animals and humans and not like strange ufos as in movies? πŸ‘½πŸ›Έ I hope the question is clear because it is difficult subject! πŸ™‚ πŸ˜›
It can be look like anything... like on earth or else. and see the video in this story how it can be how they look.... But for now we do not know how they look... Maybe in the future

Pretty elucidator lesson on a though theme. Appreciated. What do you think of Fermi Paradox? Do you think that any of the current equations are able to break the paradox?

Pretty elucidator lesson on a though theme. Appreciated. What do you think of Fermi Paradox? Do you think that any of the current equations are able to break the paradox?
Thank you. I try to tell it that everyone can understand this difficult matter. πŸ˜ƒ
And good question!!
There is live on microscoping cells (Begin of live). But the universe is really big -- 92 billion lightyear observable -- in what we can see plus more what we can not see. So, The argue is that most be something like what we have on earth in other form but there are no proof that are really there. Only on microscoping cells.

But the instruments they use are to weak at the moment to proof this fact if there's life on other planets.
But maybe in the future there will be instrument to proof something with life on other planets

Modificato da Daniel-Mulder .
Pretty elucidator lesson on a though theme. Appreciated. What do you think of Fermi Paradox? Do you think that any of the current equations are able to break the paradox?
Thank you. I try to tell it that everyone can understand this difficult matter. πŸ˜ƒ
And good question!!
There is live on microscoping cells (Begin of live). But the universe is really big -- 92 billion lightyear observable -- in what we can see plus more what we can not see. So, The argue is that most be something like what we have on earth in other form but there are no proof that are really there. Only on microscoping cells.

But the instruments they use are to weak at the moment to proof this fact if there's life on other planets.
But maybe in the future there will be instrument to proof something with life on other planets

The Rare Earth hypothesis argues that the origin of life and the evolution of biological complexity, such as sexually reproducing, multicellular organisms on Earth, and subsequently human intelligence, required an improbable combination of astrophysical and geological events and circumstances. Carl Sagan and Frank Drake, among others, argued that Earth is a typical rocky planet in a typical planetary system, located in a non-exceptional region of a common barred spiral galaxy. From the principle of mediocrity (extended from the Copernican principle), they argued that the evolution of life on Earth, including human beings, was also typical, and therefore that the universe teems with complex life. Which point of view are you closer in your mind? The Earth is just a rarity or Earth is a typical sample among all others?

The Rare Earth hypothesis argues that the origin of life and the evolution of biological complexity, such as sexually reproducing, multicellular organisms on Earth, and subsequently human intelligence, required an improbable combination of astrophysical and geological events and circumstances. Carl Sagan and Frank Drake, among others, argued that Earth is a typical rocky planet in a typical planetary system, located in a non-exceptional region of a common barred spiral galaxy. From the principle of mediocrity (extended from the Copernican principle), they argued that the evolution of life on Earth, including human beings, was also typical, and therefore that the universe teems with complex life. Which point of view are you closer in your mind? The Earth is just a rarity or Earth is a typical sample among all others?

If Earth is truly the only "inhabited" planet then it is a rarity considering the amount of planets there are in the universe. If there are several planets that are habitable, it is an example like any other with their own unique creatures, complex life and intelligence